| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Jurassic Jokerd 3y 25 | K Dodington — 16% R121 W19 P61 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 24 (4) | 23 (4) | 30 (3) | 28 (5) | 40 (1) | 28 (4) | 39 (2) | 32 (2) | 29 (3) | 34 (2) | 30 | 36 | 20 | 34 | 29 | 31 | 3 | 11/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Foxrock Tonyd 3y 35 | B G Backhurst — 17% R223 W37 P122 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 45 (3) | 32 (6) | 52 (3) | 55 (1) | 28 (3) | 31 (1) | 26 (2) | 43 (5) | 25 (3) | 55 (2) | 41 | 31 | 23 | 33 | 34 | 34 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Savana Tonkad 1y 25 | B G Backhurst — 17% R223 W37 P122 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | - | 19 (5) | 9 (6) | 18 (5) | 31 (1) | 18 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | 54 | 45 | - | 45 | 18 | 29 | 5 | 6/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Savana Legacyb 4y 26 | C D Hamblin — 24% R63 W15 P43 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 28 (3) | 28 (2) | 22 (5) | 25 (5) | 26 (5) | 29 (4) | 36 (1) | 22 (5) | 28 (3) | 25 (5) | 39 | 30 | 43 | 37 | 27 | 30 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 5 | ▶ Quivers Amazed 3y 17 | D O Pearce — 21% R143 W30 P86 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 35 (1) | 21 (6) | 27 (4) | 27 (6) | 31 (2) | 34 (1) | 22 (3) | 23 (5) | 27 (5) | 35 (1) | 30 | 58 | 51 | 49 | 29 | 35 | 1 | 5/2 | |
Quivers Amaze combines the best C&D record in the field (3 wins from 8 runs, 37.5% strike rate) with the best draw at Oxford 253m D3 (T5 at 22.58%). When the composite model is weak (18.8%) and performance averages are virtually identical across the field (28.1 vs 30.7 for the leaders — just 2.6 points), C&D proven ability and draw advantage become the primary selection criteria. Those 3 C&D wins prove this dog genuinely knows how to win at Oxford 253m, not just place. Recent form of 6,2,1,3,5 is inconsistent — that 6th and 5th are concerning — but the win three back confirms current ability when things go right. The T5 draw gives a clean outside run into the first bend, avoiding the inside crowding that punishes T1-T2 runners in these sprints. Tentative confidence because the field is incredibly tight, recent form is patchy, and Oxford 253m is inherently volatile — but the combination of best C&D record and best draw in a pick-em field makes this the logical selection.
Best current form in field; draw is the vulnerability
Experience but draw against
Proven winner but worst performer in field
Extremely tight field. C&D specialists everywhere. Draw breaks the deadlock.
T1:17.33%, T2:17.48%, T3:18.31%, T4:20.11%, T5:22.58%, T6:21.23% — T5 best, outside corridor favoured
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 253m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.