Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Matts Euniceb 3y 5 | P H Harnden — 18% R387 W70 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | 55 | - | 30 (3) | 33 (2) | 37 (4) | 29 (1) | 24 (4) | 25 (6) | 39 (6) | 24 (1) | 33 (5) | - | 34 | 32 | 23 | 30 | 31 | 25 | 1 | 5/2JF | ||
| 2 | ▶ Savana Sarokod 4y 16 | P Tsirigotis — 18% R56 W10 P29 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | - | 35 (1) | 28 (5) | 29 (4) | 29 (4) | 32 (3) | 28 (4) | 26 (5) | 37 (1) | 23 (6) | 23 (5) | 34 | 41 | 42 | 16 | 29 | 30 | 2 | 11/4 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Jungles Aceb 1y 1 | M J Dartnall — 9% R11 W1 P5 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | 5 | 3 | 12/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Monaghan Princed 2y 6 | N J Deas — 17% R456 W76 P249 Trainer form — last 3 months | 42 | - | 20 (5) | 17 (6) | 30 (2) | 24 (2) | 26 (6) | 28 (5) | 37 (4) | 28 (5) | - | - | 33 | 31 | 29 | 30 | 26 | 29 | 4 | 9/2 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Cushie Seamied 1y | A Welch — 15% R292 W44 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | 24 (6) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | 5/2JF | ||
| 6 | ▶ Pullinamixerd 4y 24 | A Welch — 15% R292 W44 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 33 (2) | 29 (3) | 26 (3) | 30 (2) | 26 (2) | 30 (3) | 23 (5) | 26 (5) | 33 (3) | 37 (1) | 14 | 20 | 22 | 20 | 28 | 24 | 6 | 9/2 | ||
Matts Eunice holds the clearest structural case in this field: speed rank 1 at 55, performance rank 1 at P37, and the optimal T1 draw — the combination that the 270m sprint framework rewards most consistently. She won D3 on 31 March (P29, pos 1) and has been running competitively at D2/D3 level, demonstrating she is capable of winning at or above this grade. The 22% win rate at this track with a 39% place rate reflects a consistent performer who finds the frame regularly. Her last run was 22 April (P37, 4th) — a month's gap which slightly reduces conviction but does not undermine the structural case. Against two debutants and a field whose other experienced members trail by 6+ points on speed, Matts Eunice holds the simplest selection framework: best draw, best speed, best performance. Confidence is capped at Tentative given the debutant wildcards in T3 and T5.
Fastest trial on card and a first-place trial finish — the most dangerous debutant in today's fields. T5 draw and debut uncertainty prevent selection.
Best challenger from experienced section — class drop from D2 gives her a realistic placing chance.
Debutant with no form data. T3 draw is the only positive — impossible to assess on analytical framework.
Structural trap disadvantage plus last place last time out plus lowest speed rank. Clear elimination.
Consistent D3 third-placer but T6 at a 270m sprint is a near-permanent structural disqualifier.
T1 is structural apex at D3 sprints. Two debutants (T3, T5) add unknown variance. Speed rank 1 among experienced runners is the primary anchor.
T1:27.44% T2:25.43% T3:21.51% T5:21.19% T6:13.86%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.