| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Queen Katherineb 1y 25 | D P Brabon — 23% R361 W82 P213 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 91 (1) | 80 (2) | 76 (3) | 36 (4) | 74 (3) | 86 (2) | 35 (5) | 47 (1) | 47 (1) | 28 (4) | 44 | 55 | 28 | 64 | 38 | 44 | 4 | 15/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Eddies Giftb 2y 27 | D Puddy — 16% R91 W15 P46 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 52 | 55 (5) | 63 (4) | 70 (3) | 83 (3) | 42 (2) | 47 (1) | 30 (5) | 35 (5) | 70 (2) | 44 (6) | 66 | 51 | 34 | 52 | 50 | 54 | 1 | 2/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Hintond 3y 24 | G L Davidson — 13% R236 W30 P106 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 27 (6) | 36 (3) | 29 (5) | 46 (1) | 38 (3) | 45 (1) | 25 (6) | 39 (2) | 41 (1) | 30 (4) | 53 | 45 | 35 | 41 | 38 | 43 | 6 | 11/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Without Justiced 4y 26 | B D O'sullivan — 18% R544 W99 P302 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 33 (3) | 33 (5) | 31 (5) | 46 (1) | 34 (5) | 42 (2) | 40 (2) | 38 (3) | 42 (2) | 37 (3) | 47 | 51 | 46 | 50 | 44 | 46 | 3 | 9/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Angels Gooldb 1y 14 | N F Carter — 17% R250 W42 P132 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 34 (5) | 23 (6) | 54 (6) | 58 (6) | 93 (2) | 46 (1) | 44 (5) | 46 (1) | 31 (5) | 30 (5) | 54 | 54 | 23 | 54 | 36 | 44 | 5 | 20/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Simon Johnd 2y 28 | D P Brabon — 23% R361 W82 P213 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 48 | 90 (1) | 80 (2) | 64 (4) | 67 (2) | 84 (2) | 40 (3) | 67 (4) | 95 (1) | 47 (1) | 37 (3) | 39 | 60 | 25 | 53 | 49 | 49 | 2 | 5/2 | |
Eddies Gift is marginally the best dog in this field on ratings, confirmed by a string of competitive efforts at D1 level including a close second last time. He's a confirmed front-runner with strong early pace who runs the rail-to-middle line, and his individual trap 2 record (suit 66) is actually very good despite the aggregate data being poor. The concern is clear — trap 2 at D1 level over 277 metres at Central Park wins at barely half the expected rate from over 200 runs. That's a brutal structural headwind. His quality may be enough to overcome it, but it's impossible to ignore the weight of evidence against this draw.
Supremely consistent and well drawn — the each-way alternative with a genuine win chance.
Near-identical quality to the pick but drawn in the best trap by far — the structural evidence strongly favours him.
Capable on her day but inconsistent and drawn in a weak trap position.
Recent winner from a dominant trap but inconsistent overall — place prospect.
Brilliant or invisible — too inconsistent to trust despite her last win.
Massive trap bias at D1 level — the middle-to-outside traps dominate heavily. T2 at 9.6% from 218 runs is barely half the expected rate. The predicted winner is drawn there — a significant structural headwind.
T1:13.9% T2:9.6% T3:22.0% T4:22.0% T5:15.2% T6:23.7%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.