| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Savana Maryloub 4y 33 | T J Nevin — 17% R446 W77 P217 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 22 (4) | 21 (3) | 23 (1) | 19 (3) | 13 (5) | 26 (5) | 29 (4) | 32 (3) | 28 (1) | - | 33 | 30 | 11 | 36 | 30 | 31 | 5 | 14/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Savana Legacyb 4y 36 | C D Hamblin — 24% R63 W15 P43 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 31 (2) | 28 (2) | 22 (5) | 25 (5) | 26 (5) | 29 (4) | 36 (1) | 22 (5) | 28 (3) | 25 (5) | 41 | 30 | 44 | 38 | 28 | 31 | 3 | 5/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Savana Tonkad 1y 25 | B G Backhurst — 17% R223 W37 P122 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | - | 27 (3) | 9 (6) | 18 (5) | 31 (1) | 18 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 40 | - | 40 | 21 | 28 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Savana Dakotab 4y 26 | T J Nevin — 17% R446 W77 P217 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | - | 19 (6) | 18 (6) | 24 (4) | 22 (5) | 24 (5) | 35 (1) | 19 (5) | 28 (4) | 36 (1) | 20 (6) | 40 | 30 | 30 | 29 | 23 | 27 | 2 | 12/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Alohas Cometd 2y 14 | T J Nevin — 17% R446 W77 P217 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 23 (4) | 20 (5) | 34 (1) | 23 (5) | 23 (4) | 33 (1) | 21 (2) | 20 (6) | 27 (3) | - | 49 | 47 | 72 | 44 | 29 | 35 | 1 | 4/9F | |
The best speed figure in the field and the strongest class suitability by far at 72, reflecting a dog who has been running in D2 company and now drops back to D3. Won over course and distance three starts ago at this level and has been competitive in the higher grade since. Trap 6 wins at 20.7% from 82 runs — above average — and his suitability scores are the best across the board. The drop in grade is the key positive here — he's been tested at a higher level and returns to a class where he's already proven. In a low-separation race, the class edge makes the difference.
Inside draw and recent winning form make her the main danger in an open sprint.
Consistent placer with a good trainer — reliable for a frame but may lack the speed to win.
Decent suitability but erratic form and the weakest speed figure — hard to trust.
Two consecutive sixths and nothing to suggest a revival — the outsider of the field.
Inverted composite separation — R2 and R3 both beat R1. Extremely unpredictable grade. T1 appears dominant but from a small sample. T3 is dead. Speed rank 1 wins 23.7% from 203 runs — some speed signal.
T1:26.9% T2:18.9% T3:14.8% T4:20.4% T5:20.9% T6:20.7%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 253m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.