Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Baggios Nikitab 3y 15 | D O Pearce — 21% R143 W30 P86 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 52 | 30 (4) | 36 (1) | 38 (6) | 46 (4) | 39 (4) | 44 (4) | 63 (2) | 62 (1) | 41 (4) | 45 (4) | 34 | 22 | 28 | 22 | 46 | 39 | 5 | 13/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Sussex Cosmosb 2y 16 | B G Backhurst — 17% R223 W37 P122 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 41 | 41 (5) | 37 (4) | 53 (4) | 49 (2) | 40 (5) | 79 (3) | 57 (4) | 75 (2) | 65 (2) | 64 (3) | 35 | 33 | 27 | 30 | 52 | 45 | 3 | 11/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Savana Catapillad 2y 23 | T J Nevin — 17% R443 W77 P216 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 50 | 26 (1) | 29 (5) | 71 (1) | 39 (5) | 23 (1) | 22 (1) | 21 (1) | 10 (6) | 27 (6) | 61 (1) | 48 | 41 | - | 38 | 36 | 38 | 4 | 15/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Alohas Rascald 2y 37 | T J Nevin — 17% R443 W77 P216 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 59 | 32 (4) | 11 (6) | 11 (6) | 8 (6) | 46 (4) | 51 (4) | 43 (3) | 46 (3) | 60 (1) | 60 (1) | 38 | 38 | 39 | 38 | 50 | 46 | 2 | 2/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Savana Kilshanigb 4y 28 | C D Hamblin — 24% R63 W15 P43 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 49 | 59 (1) | 44 (3) | 41 (5) | 12 (4) | 40 (4) | 31 (5) | 43 (3) | 52 (2) | 52 (3) | 69 (1) | 37 | 28 | 23 | 31 | 43 | 39 | 1 | 8/1 | |
Won her last start when stepping up from A7 and now faces a tougher test in A6. A closer by nature with the best speed rating in the field, which is a strong signal at Oxford where the fastest dog has a clear historical edge. Trap 5 wins at a healthy 20.7% here and she has good closing ability to pick off tiring front runners. The concern is the step up in class — her previous form at A7 level may not translate, and her track and distance suitability scores are modest. Still, the combination of the best speed figure and a closing style that suits the race shape makes her the pick.
Closing style and a decent draw make her the main danger if the pace is honest.
Early speed from a weak draw — likely to be involved but hard to see her winning.
Best draw in the race but far too inconsistent to rely on.
Decent pace profile wasted in the worst draw — hard to fancy despite consistent form.
Low separation race — composite rank 1 barely outperforms rank 3. T3 dominates but no runner draws there with a matching profile. T1 and T4 both structurally disadvantaged.
T1:15.8% T2:23.5% T3:26.8% T4:15.6% T5:20.7% T6:22.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 450m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Baggios Nikita | 56 | 47 | Front Runner |
2Sussex Cosmos | 0 | 100 | Closer |
3Savana Catapilla | 50 | 39 | All-Rounder |
4Alohas Rascal | 57 | 50 | Front Runner |
5Savana Kilshanig | 44 | 72 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.