Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Teebayb 3y 16 | I Zivkovic — 14% R570 W77 P268 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | - | 17 (5) | 18 (6) | 27 (2) | 24 (3) | 29 (1) | 18 (4) | 23 (2) | 19 (4) | 21 (4) | 14 (6) | 37 | 32 | 19 | 29 | 21 | 27 | 3 | 8/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Boozed Zoneb 3y 6 | I Zivkovic — 14% R570 W77 P268 Trainer form — last 3 months | 41 | - | 20 (5) | 12 (5) | 41 (6) | 56 (5) | 49 (4) | 66 (2) | 56 (3) | 48 (5) | 79 (1) | 48 (6) | 27 | 29 | 17 | 14 | 41 | 32 | 5 | 2/1JF | ||
| 3 | ▶ Darraghs Bonod 3y 17 | T D Coote — 18% R546 W100 P275 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | - | 24 (4) | 19 (6) | 18 (6) | 19 (6) | 27 (2) | 29 (1) | 22 (3) | 14 (6) | 21 (4) | 29 (1) | 28 | 24 | 20 | 32 | 22 | 25 | 1 | 2/1JF | ||
| 4 | ▶ Racenight Emmab 3y 16 | J G Hurst — 19% R258 W48 P147 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | - | 17 (6) | 16 (6) | 18 (5) | 31 (1) | 20 (5) | 25 (4) | 30 (1) | 17 (6) | 19 (5) | 30 (1) | 19 | 19 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 20 | 4 | 7/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Ramblin Frostyb 1y | W M Lyons — 19% R983 W191 P525 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 7/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Gazes Bobyd 3y 16 | W M Lyons — 19% R983 W191 P525 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | - | 28 (1) | 26 (3) | 22 (3) | 27 (2) | 24 (4) | 25 (2) | 25 (4) | 22 (5) | 24 (3) | 23 (4) | 29 | 24 | 18 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 2 | 3/1 | ||
The model's projected winner on debut — a dog making its first competitive appearance with no prior performance figures to assess. Trap 5 is structurally the weakest draw at this distance and grade at just 10.9% from 276 runs, well below the field average. Without any historical data to build a case, it is genuinely impossible to assess whether this dog has the pace to overcome the draw disadvantage. Debutants occasionally spring surprises, particularly if they have shown promising trial figures, but none are available here. The model sees something in the pedigree or trial data — whether that translates to competitive pace at D4 level remains to be seen.
C&D form is the main case for inclusion but last run is a red flag. Danger on a rebound basis only.
Form momentum from D5 win earns danger status, but widest trap at this short trip and a grade rise are meaningful concerns.
Below-field figures with no compelling structural angle. Not in contention.
Dramatic form collapse rules this out entirely. Opposed.
Best structural draw, best speed, C&D-proven. Strong AI Pick despite Speculative confidence on the card overall.
Trap 3 is structurally dominant at 24.3% from 276 runs — 6 points clear of the field average. Trap 5 is the dead draw at 10.9%. Composite rank separation is minimal; model ranks are unreliable in this grade at this trip.
T1:18.3% T2:17.7% T3:24.3% T4:17.5% T5:10.9% T6:19.4%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 268m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.