| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Deelish Kobed 2y 27 | J R Hall — 21% R330 W69 P186 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 31 | 59 (3) | 58 (1) | 63 (3) | 50 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 33 | 86 | - | 49 | 50 | 54 | 5 | 6/4F | |
| 2 | ▶ Lov De Nitelifeb 3y 16 | K S Harrison — 17% R348 W58 P193 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 59 | 27 (6) | 35 (2) | 70 (3) | 63 (3) | 72 (2) | 51 (5) | 80 (1) | 52 (2) | 78 (5) | - | 58 | 63 | 61 | 58 | 64 | 61 | 2 | 7/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Brosna Cashd 2y 27 | R Williams — 15% R321 W47 P156 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 50 | 32 (6) | 76 (2) | 76 (2) | 84 (1) | 74 (3) | 77 (4) | 61 (4) | 67 (3) | 71 (2) | 86 (1) | 30 | 44 | 28 | 43 | 72 | 51 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Swift Zilchb 3y 6 | P A Holder — 12% R142 W17 P67 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 68 | 73 (3) | 86 (1) | 66 (4) | 54 (4) | 86 (1) | 69 (3) | 53 (6) | 61 (5) | 92 (1) | 89 (1) | 69 | 64 | 34 | 45 | 70 | 63 | 1 | 9/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Midget Leeb 2y 6 | K S Harrison — 17% R348 W58 P193 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 49 | 73 (3) | 71 (3) | 66 (3) | 64 (4) | 63 (3) | 59 (6) | 71 (6) | 51 (5) | 82 (1) | 70 (2) | 44 | 68 | - | 54 | 65 | 59 | 3 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Seomra Opheliab 2y 35 | C A Gilbert — 18% R57 W10 P27 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 45 | 89 (3) | 84 (2) | 93 (3) | 70 (3) | 58 (5) | 100 (1) | 55 (5) | 48 (5) | 55 (5) | - | 33 | 33 | 28 | 23 | 64 | 42 | 6 | 10/1 | |
The model's projected winner drawn in one of the two best boxes at A2 480m. His Fader profile with early pace of 85 and an exceptional first bend rating of 68 — the highest in the field — means he will lead through the opening bend and look to establish a decisive advantage. Recent form includes a 69 last time and he has proven A2 ability. The trap suitability of 69 is outstanding and the pace consistency of 89 is among the best on the card — a Fader who fades predictably is easier to manage than a wild one. The concern is whether that fade will catch up to him against quality closers like Brosna Cash, but the first bend rating gives him the best possible chance of building an unassailable lead.
Outstanding suitability and high-class ability — the clear danger when she turns up.
Classiest dog on raw form with a devastating closing kick — will sweep past the Faders if they tire.
Strong draw and high suitability but trial-heavy form means the profile is unproven in competitive company.
Class Fader with good suitability but drawn outside the pick and less consistent — likely to chase home the winner.
Capable closer on her day but inconsistent form and the weakest draw make winning difficult.
Low separation (R1 20.6% vs R3 16.7% = 3.9pp) from 281 runs. T1 and T4 are the best positions. This is the highest-quality race on the card with strong form across the field.
T1:21.7% T2:17.0% T3:17.5% T4:20.0% T5:17.0% T6:15.2%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 480m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Deelish Kobe | 49 | 75 | Closer |
2Lov De Nitelife | 51 | 25 | All-Rounder |
3Brosna Cash | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Swift Zilch | 85 | 0 | Fader |
5Midget Lee | 63 | 0 | Fader |
6Seomra Ophelia | 0 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.