WATCH PGR ON GREYHOUNDS.ATTHERACES.COM
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Pharis Pearlb 2y 5 | R Williams — 15% R321 W47 P156 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 26 (4) | 23 (5) | 30 (2) | 25 (5) | 37 (1) | 27 (4) | 30 (3) | 23 (2) | 33 (5) | - | 34 | 43 | 31 | 37 | 27 | 33 | 3 | 15/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Chiti Khabootrib 4y 15 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 24 (5) | 36 (1) | 22 (6) | 25 (4) | 36 (1) | 29 (3) | 25 (3) | 30 (3) | 20 (5) | 25 (4) | 36 | 31 | 34 | 11 | 25 | 26 | 5 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Slim Shadyd 3y 6 | N P Ralph Jnr — 18% R50 W9 P29 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 15 (6) | 23 (5) | 30 (3) | 24 (5) | 19 (6) | 20 (6) | 26 (3) | 32 (2) | 22 (5) | 28 (4) | 39 | 27 | 14 | 17 | 26 | 27 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Barnagrane Janb 3y 15 | S W Deakin — 17% R519 W87 P242 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 65 | 27 (3) | 25 (5) | 21 (6) | 28 (3) | 24 (5) | 22 (5) | 23 (4) | 25 (5) | 33 (2) | 23 (5) | 39 | 22 | 31 | 15 | 27 | 26 | 1 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Roseville Daisyb 3y 15 | N M Slowley — 16% R99 W16 P43 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 35 | 32 (4) | 30 (4) | 33 (1) | 30 (2) | 21 (6) | 28 (4) | 31 (3) | 29 (2) | 30 (6) | 23 (6) | 22 | 37 | 28 | 25 | 32 | 30 | 2 | 10/3 | |
| 6 | ▶ Francos Kellyb 1y 25 | K S Harrison — 17% R348 W58 P193 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 36 (6) | 57 (2) | 47 (4) | 39 (5) | 19 (6) | 23 (6) | - | - | - | - | 45 | 61 | - | 59 | - | 28 | 6 | 3/1 | |
The model's projected winner on the best combination of performance and suitability, and at 32 she's the highest-rated dog in the field — though that bar is very low. Her closer profile with maximum closing speed is a concern over 270 metres where there's minimal room to close, but her speed rating of 53 is the best in the race and she has recent place form at D3. The trial contamination — three of six runs — means the form picture is incomplete. Trap 5 is neutral at 18.2%. This is a marginal selection in a race that could go to any of four runners.
Most consistent runner in the field with solid venue form — the clear danger in a wide-open sprint.
Best-drawn runner but modest form and poor distance suitability undermine the structural edge.
Dead draw and below-par suitability make this a very difficult proposition.
Fastest out of the traps but poor form and suitability mean the early lead may not translate to a win.
No open-race form whatsoever — impossible to assess and a pure gamble.
881 runs give reliable data. Low separation (R1 20.2% vs R3 16.6% = 3.7pp). T2 is the best draw, T3 the worst. Multiple trial-contaminated runners make this highly speculative.
T1:18.5% T2:20.9% T3:13.9% T4:19.1% T5:18.2% T6:18.6%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.