Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
Time Greyhound Nutrition Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Drumdoit Pixieb 2y 8 | L J Stephenson — 20% R249 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | 67 | 43 | - | 32 (2) | 40 (1) | 32 (3) | 32 (3) | 34 (2) | 29 (2) | 22 (5) | 23 (5) | 30 (4) | 41 (1) | 51 | 41 | 27 | 41 | 30 | 35 | 6 | 9/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Task Sassyb 2y 15 | L J Stephenson — 20% R249 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | 58 | 22 | 32 (4) | 36 (3) | 29 (1) | 67 (4) | 48 (5) | 49 (6) | 68 (4) | 26 (1) | 38 (6) | - | 53 | 65 | 47 | 52 | 49 | 52 | 2 | 13/8F | |
| 3 | ▶ Mustang Gracieb 5y 13 | D L Fretwell — 16% R162 W26 P102 Trainer form — last 3 months | 58 | 52 | - | 26 (6) | 31 (4) | 34 (3) | 24 (5) | 30 (2) | 41 (1) | 37 (1) | 28 (3) | 25 (4) | 27 (3) | 44 | 28 | 34 | 35 | 29 | 31 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Fiery Pad 4y 24 | S C Oxley — 17% R146 W25 P89 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | 49 | - | 23 (4) | 29 (2) | 30 (3) | 30 (3) | 27 (3) | 28 (3) | 27 (4) | 30 (3) | 36 (1) | 25 (5) | 47 | 28 | 24 | 28 | 30 | 32 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Queen Farrahb 2y 27 | L J Stephenson — 20% R249 W50 P149 Trainer form — last 3 months | 58 | 49 | 78 | 47 (4) | 33 (6) | 51 (4) | 47 (5) | 32 (3) | 37 (2) | 44 (6) | 46 (5) | 45 (5) | 78 (1) | 52 | 27 | 18 | 28 | 48 | 44 | 1 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Mr Boombasticd 3y 5 | S C Oxley — 17% R146 W25 P89 Trainer form — last 3 months | 56 | 48 | - | 25 (4) | 36 (1) | 23 (5) | 29 (3) | 25 (4) | 26 (4) | 27 (2) | 24 (5) | 36 (1) | 20 (5) | 46 | 33 | - | 37 | 29 | 32 | 5 | 16/1 | |
Queen Farrah has maximum early pace and an outstanding bend action — at 280m these are the qualities that win races, and she has them in abundance. She won at D2 level in March from a decent run and has been in trial form since. The pace profile at a sprint distance is more important than any rating or composite score, and as the dog most likely to lead through the first bend from the second-best structural trap, she gets the nod from the model.
Best suitability at Sheffield 280m but closing style is a question at this trip.
D2 winner earlier in the year but out of form — hard to be confident.
Won at D3 last week — stepping up in grade in a very competitive sprint.
Consistent lower-grade performer in the best structural trap — cannot be overlooked.
Decent D3 form but stepping up from the worst structural draw — hard to support.
EXTREME LOW SEPARATION — R1 wins 22.25% vs R3 at 22.08%. Composite ranking is essentially random here. Traps four and five are marginally the best boxes but the overall difference between traps is minimal. This is a near-coin-flip race structurally.
T1:20.77% T2:21.05% T3:17.18% T4:22.96% T5:22.31% T6:15.71%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 280m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.