Loading racecard
Loading racecard
Durham & District Retired Greyhounds Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Lightuptheskyb 3y 6 | J A Teal — 13% R200 W26 P103 Trainer form — last 3 months | 45 | 49 | 54 (4) | 62 (3) | 67 (2) | 62 (4) | 76 (1) | 59 (2) | 77 (1) | 60 (2) | 38 (6) | 65 (2) | 39 | 34 | 24 | 58 | 64 | 57 | 2 | 6/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Laurens Jay Lob 1y 9 | C Mcnicholas — 17% R529 W88 P270 Trainer form — last 3 months | 56 | 56 | 74 (1) | 66 (3) | 74 (2) | 78 (1) | 66 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | 71 | 18 | 70 | 73 | 72 | 1 | 4/7F | ||
| 3 | ▶ Noirs Lulub 2y 18 | J A Teal — 13% R200 W26 P103 Trainer form — last 3 months | 40 | 51 | 57 (2) | 40 (6) | 36 (6) | 36 (6) | 41 (5) | 79 (1) | 51 (5) | 61 (3) | 51 (5) | 79 (1) | 43 | 43 | - | 36 | 58 | 52 | 5 | 8/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Reagrove Remyb 1yN/R 5 | P Miller — 17% R497 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | 49 | 43 (6) | 49 (3) | 54 (4) | 43 (5) | 49 (5) | 50 (5) | 59 (5) | 53 (5) | 52 (4) | 48 (6) | 42 | 44 | 47 | 32 | 61 | 53 | - | - | ||
| 5 | ▶ Stonepark Patsyd 4y 15 | S Linley — 18% R381 W68 P193 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | 45 | 60 (3) | 61 (4) | 68 (3) | 62 (2) | 67 (3) | 57 (3) | 62 (4) | 59 (3) | 82 (5) | - | 38 | 35 | 63 | 29 | 63 | 53 | 4 | 11/4 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Barnfield Chiefb 3y 9 | P Miller — 17% R497 W86 P255 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | 57 | 56 (4) | 54 (5) | 63 (3) | 50 (5) | 56 (4) | 77 (1) | 80 (1) | 50 (5) | 47 (4) | 45 (6) | 27 | 26 | 25 | 31 | 61 | 49 | 3 | 12/1 | ||
Laurens Jay Lo stands out dramatically in this field — her composite score of 72 is twenty points clear of her nearest rival, and the suitability profile is outstanding across every dimension. She knows this track inside out with a track suitability of 71, handles this distance perfectly at 70, and has exceptional trap suitability of 67. She ran a fine second at A3 last time and has won both her other recent starts. The Fader profile is a concern in theory, but her class advantage over this field is so significant that she can afford to fade slightly and still win — she fades from first to first rather than first to fourth. The trap 2 draw is structurally dead at 13.9%, which is the one cloud over an otherwise compelling case, but the class gap here is enormous.
Improving form with the best distance suitability and a strong trainer — the clear danger despite the below-average draw.
Mid-pack form and figures — competitive for minor honours but the pick and danger are too strong.
Dominant draw and deep class credentials but terrible recent form — the ability is there but the confidence is not.
Class and draw align but inconsistent form means she's a place contender rather than a winning one.
Last-start winner but the form before that was poor and suitability is low — too inconsistent to be confident.
Low separation but the pick has a massive composite edge (comp 72 vs field avg 53) which makes the rating more meaningful here despite the low R1-R3 gap.
T1:15.1% T2:13.9% T3:16.9% T4:20.0% T5:20.1% T6:16.7%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 450m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Lightupthesky | 49 | 53 | All-Rounder |
2Laurens Jay Lo | 62 | 35 | Fader |
3Noirs Lulu | 51 | 47 | All-Rounder |
4Reagrove Remy | 49 | 59 | Closer |
5Stonepark Patsy | 47 | 61 | Closer |
6Barnfield Chief | 55 | 38 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.