Yarmouth Vs Suffolk Downs Inter Track Race
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Savana Colab 3y 45 | J M Ray — 16% R249 W39 P146 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 60 | 61 (4) | 68 (3) | 82 (1) | 75 (1) | 75 (1) | 62 (2) | 64 (3) | 51 (4) | 75 (1) | 50 (3) | 36 | 15 | - | - | 69 | 41 | 4 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Savana Cosmicb 4y 15 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 33 | 86 (1) | 71 (3) | 56 (5) | 65 (4) | 66 (3) | 77 (2) | 61 (4) | 17 (5) | 80 (3) | - | 50 | - | 25 | - | 61 | 54 | 1 | 2/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Savana Ribenab 2yN/R 13 | J M Ray — 16% R249 W39 P146 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 29 | 65 (3) | 69 (3) | 17 (4) | 64 (2) | 77 (2) | 58 (4) | 72 (2) | 77 (3) | 79 (3) | 65 (3) | 18 | - | 21 | - | 60 | 33 | - | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Adamant Erinb 1y 35 | J E Craske — 22% R89 W20 P52 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 58 | 65 | 76 (6) | 68 (2) | 80 (2) | 53 (2) | 60 (5) | 68 (3) | - | - | - | - | 34 | 43 | - | 28 | 67 | 46 | 2 | 4/5F | |
| 5 | ▶ Bodell Bucksd 4yN/R 23 | M P Brown — 21% R425 W89 P244 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 47 | 52 (5) | 85 (1) | 58 (3) | 52 (4) | 73 (5) | 14 (1) | 62 (6) | 68 (4) | 76 (4) | - | 23 | - | - | - | 61 | 36 | - | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Solid Lunab 3y 16 | J E Craske — 22% R89 W20 P52 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 53 | 51 (4) | 71 (2) | 63 (3) | 52 (5) | 70 (2) | 94 (2) | 52 (1) | 62 (4) | 63 (3) | - | 24 | 40 | - | 26 | 67 | 43 | 3 | 9/2 | |
A closer by profile who has the strongest class credentials in the field going back a few starts — won an S3 over 548 metres and has mixed it in Open company at the shorter trip. Recent form looks modest on the face of it but those were Invitation contests where finishing position does not tell the whole story. The draw is not ideal, but she has the late kick to trouble them if the front-runners over-do the pace.
Strong draw, in-form yard and fast into stride — the obvious danger to the pick.
Dominant draw and proven form — a serious threat.
Wrong trip, wrong box — a genuine structural mismatch.
Dead trap and weak profile — very hard to make a case.
Form in the doldrums — hard to see a turnaround here.
This is a low-separation race where the model rates dogs similarly and trap bias is the primary structural signal. The pattern at the Invitation grade favours outside draws — the pick drawn in trap 2 is not in the dominant box, and that is a legitimate concern that warrants lower confidence.
T1:0% T2:18.2% T3:0% T4:26.7% T5:15.4% T6:33.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Savana Cola | 100 | 45 | Front Runner |
2Savana Cosmic | 0 | 100 | Closer |
3Savana Ribena | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Adamant Erin | 68 | 20 | Fader |
5Bodell Bucks | 100 | 55 | All-Rounder |
6Solid Luna | 32 | 27 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.