Loading...
LUKE COMBS NI AFTER RACING S4 325
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Porthall Harbourd 1y 22 | Dylan Porter — 0% R1 W0 P0 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 12 | - | 64 (4) | 45 (6) | 59 (6) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 22 | - | - | - | 56 | 40 | 5 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Mallogs Wallend 1y 1 | - | - | 50 | - | 64 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | 64 | 42 | 3 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Kirsty Romeod 1y 2 | Martin Gallagher — 0% R1 W0 P1 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 67 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | 34 | 6 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Hera Daisyb 3y 25 | Paul Whyte — 0% R4 W0 P3 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | - | 67 (3) | 55 (5) | 63 (2) | 65 (3) | 76 (1) | 64 (1) | - | - | - | - | 26 | 27 | - | 14 | 64 | 36 | 2 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Eager Beautyb 2y 37 | - | - | 61 | - | 59 (2) | 46 (6) | 56 (5) | 45 (6) | 64 (6) | 47 (1) | 53 (3) | 46 (2) | 51 (3) | - | 14 | - | - | 16 | 53 | 20 | 1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Titanic Masond 2y 34 | - | - | 36 | - | 46 (6) | 39 (6) | 59 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 20 | 4 | - | |
Hera Daisy is the selection on the balance of evidence across the three strong candidates in this race. Her multi-dimensional suitability is the decisive factor: track=27, distance=14, trap=26, all positive Lifford 325m sprint credentials established through race history. Average performance of 64 — tied for joint-second highest. Best time of 17.99 — the second fastest in the race, fractionally behind Eager Beauty's 17.91. Speed rating of 56 is competitive. Form over five runs reads 68, 62, 65, 71, 60 — a 71 peak with consistent results in the 60-71 range. The combination of multi-dimensional suitability (uniquely strong among the top three contenders), near-fastest time, and strong performance average creates the most complete case. From T4 she is centrally drawn with a workable path to the first bend. The comparison to her rivals: Mallogs Wallen has composite leadership but trap=4; Kirsty Romeo has high avgPerf but zero suitability; Eager Beauty has the fastest time but very modest suitability. Hera Daisy's suitability strength differentiates her in a tight field. This race is genuinely open and rated Speculative — any of the top three could win.
Composite leader (42), 71-rated peak, consistent form. Primary danger but trap=4 is a significant concern. Inside T2 draw helps.
Fastest time (17.91), perfHeavy, highest speed (61). Modest avgPerf (53) and inconsistent form. Second danger on pace alone.
Good trap affinity (22) at T1 but race-worst pace (18.9). Cannot sustain a challenge at 325m sprint.
condElite, highest avgPerf (67), excellent form trajectory (75 peak). Zero suitability and no pace data create uncertainty. Dark horse.
Lowest performance, worst pace, zero suitability, widest draw. Clear outsider.
Three-way contest: Mallogs Wallen (composite leader, T2, but trap=4), Eager Beauty (fastest time 17.91, T5), Hera Daisy (multi-dimensional suitability, time 17.99, T4). Race is wide open.
Individual suitability.trap used as proxy — Hera Daisy trap=26 among the better scores in this race
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 325m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 325m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.