HARLOW V OXFORD INTERTRACK
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Front Layyahb 2y 24 | K R Proctor — 15% R39 W6 P18 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | - | 64 (1) | 18 (4) | 23 (5) | 23 (5) | 32 (2) | 27 (5) | 21 (6) | 30 (2) | 36 (2) | 31 (3) | 34 | 64 | - | 40 | 48 | 46 | 3 | 7/4 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Doreens Ashd 2y 16 | K G Crew — 32% R34 W11 P22 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 40 | - | 60 (4) | 35 (3) | 62 (3) | 80 (1) | 45 (4) | 69 (2) | 78 (1) | 31 (3) | 79 (1) | 68 (3) | 36 | 59 | - | 20 | 64 | 53 | 2 | 10/11F | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Early Paceb 2y 8 | D R E Ellerker — 20% R714 W146 P380 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 24 (4) | 27 (4) | 24 (6) | 33 (2) | 22 (5) | 33 (2) | 24 (4) | 26 (4) | 34 (3) | 39 (1) | 65 | 64 | - | 39 | 29 | 43 | 1 | 11/4 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Alohas Dreamb 2y 16 | T J Nevin — 18% R461 W82 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 30 (1) | 12 (6) | 18 (5) | 22 (3) | 17 (3) | 27 (1) | 27 (2) | 30 (4) | 23 (2) | - | 21 | 15 | - | - | 27 | 23 | 6 | 20/1 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Tamannab 5y 33 | T J Nevin — 18% R461 W82 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | - | 20 (5) | 32 (1) | 6 (6) | 26 (3) | 28 (4) | 35 (4) | 19 (2) | 34 (6) | 30 (3) | - | 40 | 15 | 30 | - | 30 | 30 | 5 | 10/1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Alohas Cometd 2y 15 | T J Nevin — 18% R461 W82 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 17 (6) | 23 (4) | 20 (5) | 34 (1) | 23 (5) | 23 (4) | 33 (1) | 21 (2) | 35 (6) | - | 50 | 15 | - | - | 30 | 33 | 4 | 20/1 | - | |
Early Pace gets the projection nod on the strength of her suitability profile — track suit 64 and trap suit 65 are both outstanding, and she has four course and distance starts to her name. Her form of 2,5,2,4,4 is modest but she's been competitive at this venue and the suitability advantage is significant. The concern is the performance level — at 29 she's nowhere near the quality of Doreens Ash. She's the pick on venue knowledge and suitability rather than raw ability.
Class miles ahead of the field — the AI pick and serious favourite if she handles the shorter trip.
Knows the track well and should be involved — place chance behind the principals.
Unknown at this venue with moderate Oxford form — hard to fancy on debut.
Has speed but first visit to Harlow — needs time to adapt.
Best of the Oxford newcomers — could surprise if he adapts quickly but the venue unknown is a risk.
IT grade with many newcomers to the venue. Doreens Ash has a performance rating of 64 — miles clear of this field. The prediction favours Early Pace on suitability grounds but the class gap to Doreens Ash is enormous.
Insufficient data — IT grade too small to analyse structurally
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 238m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Each dog's average pace per 10m at every distance they've run. Green = fastest, red = slowest — shows where each dog is naturally strongest. Today's distance (238m) is highlighted.
| Dog | 238m | 253m | 415m | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Front Layyah | 0.663 | — | 0.661 |
| 2 | Doreens Ash | 0.652 | — | 0.649 |
| 3 | Early Pace | 0.665 | — | — |
| 4 | Alohas Dream | 0.683 | 0.623 | — |
| 5 | Swift Tamanna | 0.690 | 0.621 | — |
| 6 | Alohas Comet | 0.670 | 0.618 | — |
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.