Loading...
Follow Newcastle Greyhounds on Facebook Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Coppice Survivord 2y 17 | J J Fenwick — 19% R498 W96 P285 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 31 | 54 | 22 (5) | 35 (1) | 61 (1) | 52 (2) | 45 (4) | 42 (5) | 38 (6) | 39 (6) | 48 (3) | 51 (3) | 48 | 48 | - | 50 | 50 | 50 | 4 | 6/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Whitehills Childb 2y 25 | R J Buckton — 19% R215 W40 P115 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 50 | 19 (6) | 19 (6) | 22 (5) | 36 (1) | 28 (4) | 26 (3) | 28 (2) | 18 (5) | 27 (3) | 37 (5) | 54 | 33 | - | 68 | 41 | 45 | 2 | 7/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Greenhill Jazzb 2y 7 | A Harrison — 19% R519 W101 P314 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 48 | 27 (2) | 36 (4) | 73 (1) | 55 (1) | 54 (4) | 28 (4) | 34 (3) | 32 (4) | - | - | 77 | 43 | - | 30 | 58 | 55 | 1 | 10/11F | |
| 4 | ▶ Drumcrow Wandab 3yN/R 4 | J T Edgar — 16% R482 W78 P272 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 51 | 31 (2) | 35 (1) | 26 (4) | 16 (6) | 28 (2) | 29 (3) | 19 (6) | 20 (3) | 25 (5) | 34 (6) | 50 | 22 | - | 27 | 30 | 31 | - | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Canny Adelaideb 4y 33 | P Rutherford — 19% R333 W63 P179 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 51 | 44 (6) | 56 (2) | 44 (1) | 32 (3) | 50 (4) | 55 (2) | 19 (1) | 20 (4) | 49 (5) | - | 51 | 49 | - | 40 | 49 | 48 | 3 | 16/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Fruity Spriteb 2y 4 | D Blackbird — 17% R1093 W184 P591 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 0 | 27 | 31 (3) | 25 (2) | 31 (4) | 27 (2) | 32 (4) | 23 (1) | 21 (4) | 26 (4) | - | 38 | 7 | - | 11 | 37 | 31 | 5 | 7/1 | |
Greenhill Jazz is the classiest dog in this field by a clear margin, and his outstanding trap suitability of 77 from the middle draw is remarkable. He won a trial last time over 480 metres, and before that was struck into and fell at A5 — a much higher grade than this. The concern is his closing profile, which is less suited to sprints where early pace is king. However, his higher gears may compensate — sometimes raw ability overcomes an unsuitable profile. At 290 metres there are fewer bends for things to go wrong, which may help given his recent trouble in running. A speculative pick based on class rather than sprinting credentials.
Best sprint credentials in the field with strong distance suitability — the main danger to the pick.
Quick away with a front-running style that suits sprints — competitive but untested in this class and distance combination.
Best recent sprint form in the field but limited by overall ability — place claims.
Honest all-rounder with decent course form but the sprint switch is an unknown — each-way at best.
Extreme closer from the wide draw over a sprint distance — the profile doesn't fit and the suitability confirms it.
Only 17 runs at these exact conditions — too few for meaningful structural analysis. Sprint distance means early pace matters most. Most runners have been racing over 480m recently, so the trip switch adds uncertainty.
Insufficient data (17 runs) — trap analysis unreliable
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 290m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.