Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Aero Elmab 3y 26 | R Taberner — 20% R707 W140 P413 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | 56 | 33 (5) | 31 (3) | 38 (2) | 34 (3) | 37 (1) | 25 (5) | 30 (6) | 32 (2) | 37 (5) | 26 (3) | 51 | 34 | 32 | 40 | 31 | 46 | 2 | 2/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Pippy Longsocksb 3y 14 | J B Thompson — 19% R509 W95 P279 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 23 (5) | 30 (2) | 24 (5) | 32 (2) | 37 (1) | 36 (1) | 31 (1) | 24 (4) | 20 (5) | 27 (3) | 37 | 29 | 26 | 42 | 27 | 42 | 5 | 25/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Rouletteb 3y 33 | C D Marston — 15% R457 W68 P209 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | - | 19 (6) | 20 (6) | 26 (5) | 30 (2) | 25 (4) | 32 (1) | 22 (6) | 24 (5) | 32 (1) | 28 (2) | 48 | 35 | - | 34 | 25 | 42 | 6 | 11/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Cashen Pogachad 2y 26 | P I Cowdrill — 14% R317 W45 P160 Trainer form — last 3 months | 45 | 50 | 58 (2) | 46 (5) | 52 (4) | 64 (1) | 54 (3) | 39 (3) | 54 (6) | 47 (2) | 51 (4) | - | 34 | 42 | - | 30 | 54 | 45 | 1 | 12/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Droopys Indexd 1y 210 | R Taberner — 20% R707 W140 P413 Trainer form — last 3 months | 60 | 23 | 74 (1) | 70 (1) | 44 (4) | 62 (2) | 51 (4) | 63 (1) | 41 (5) | 33 (2) | 32 (1) | 29 (2) | 61 | 45 | 34 | 55 | 35 | 54 | 3 | 8/11F | ||
| 6 | ▶ Flyhigh Richd 3y 14 | C Jones — 12% R305 W37 P138 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | - | 36 (1) | 31 (3) | 32 (3) | 33 (2) | 29 (4) | 36 (1) | 32 (4) | 32 (4) | 22 (6) | 36 (2) | 46 | 72 | 74 | 73 | 32 | 48 | 4 | 5/1 | ||
Cashen Pogacha drops dramatically in class from A6 over 480 metres to D3 at the sprint trip, and the ability gap between her and these rivals is enormous. Her average performance figure of 54 is around 20 points clear of the field average — the kind of margin that overwhelms any structural disadvantage. She has consistently placed and won at A6 level with figures between 47 and 56 in her last six runs, never finishing worse than fourth. The closing style is unusual for a sprint but her sheer class should see her through. This looks a straightforward task.
Best draw in the race, proven at the grade, and pace suits the sprint — the main danger to the pick.
Class rise from D4 and a weak draw — others preferred on these conditions.
Good draw but poor recent form — the structural advantage isn't enough to overcome her current limitations.
Best suitability in the race and consistent form, but simply outclassed by the big class dropper.
Outstanding suitability and recent trial form, but modest raw ability means the class dropper should still be too good.
T1 and T3 are structurally favoured. Composite rank 1 wins 20.9% — reasonable separation. Speed rank 1 also at 20.9%.
T1:22.4% T2:15.3% T3:20.1% T4:15.1% T5:14.7% T6:18.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 264m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.