@SunderlandDogs On Twitter Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Endearing Smileb 1y 15 | G A Stark — 19% R275 W53 P145 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 45 | 42 (6) | 42 (5) | 64 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 61 | 18 | 61 | 64 | 61 | 1 | 11/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Moonveen Hijackd 2y 7 | G Strike — 18% R410 W74 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 57 | 54 (4) | 45 (6) | 72 (1) | 43 (6) | 45 (6) | 46 (6) | 73 (1) | 55 (2) | 58 (2) | 70 (1) | 37 | 42 | 14 | 46 | 61 | 54 | 2 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Diddly Squatd 4y 110 | E Y Bell — 22% R520 W113 P293 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 51 | 78 (1) | 73 (1) | 45 (5) | 54 (4) | 51 (5) | 73 (1) | 58 (2) | 46 (4) | 51 (4) | 44 (6) | 31 | 45 | 23 | 38 | 52 | 47 | 3 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Millhill Yogib 1y 17 | G A Stark — 19% R275 W53 P145 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 44 | 68 (2) | 46 (5) | 46 (6) | 81 (1) | 63 (2) | 66 (2) | 62 (3) | 74 (1) | 43 (5) | - | 7 | 40 | - | 40 | - | 10 | 6 | 5/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Autumn Meadowd 3y 16 | J A Teal — 14% R206 W28 P108 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 52 | 53 (2) | 52 (4) | 43 (5) | 52 (4) | 61 (3) | 59 (3) | 59 (2) | 54 (3) | 54 (3) | 57 (3) | 24 | 25 | 13 | 24 | 56 | 45 | 5 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Speedy Ritab 1y 5 | D Blackbird — 17% R1093 W184 P591 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 50 | 64 (3) | 53 (5) | 32 (4) | 79 (5) | 59 (6) | 61 (1) | 67 (3) | 62 (2) | - | - | 41 | 44 | - | 48 | 57 | 53 | 4 | 10/3 | |
Endearing Smile has limited competitive form — just one race at A4 level returning a solid 64 for second — but that single effort was encouraging and her suitability profile is the best in this race by a distance. Track suitability of 61 and distance suitability of 61 mark her out as a dog who has proven form at Sunderland over 450 metres, presumably from a previous racing career before the recent trials. She is a closer drawn on the rail which is a reasonable structural position at 19.41%, and her finishing kick should come into play through the final two bends. The risk is that one competitive run is very little to go on, and if that 64 was an outlier rather than a baseline, she could be outclassed.
Dominant draw with strong recent form — the Fader concern is real but the structural advantage is significant.
Reliable at A4 level but lacks the peak ability of the top two — an honest placer.
Complete unknown from trials only — cannot be assessed or recommended at this level.
Consistent but plateauing — honest performer who will struggle to match the top two.
Impressive recent wins and rising through the grades but the dead draw is a significant structural barrier.
LOW SEPARATION — composite rank 1 at 19.84% vs rank 3 at 17.41%. Trap 2 is dominant at 23.49% from 315 runs. Moonveen Hijack occupies this dominant trap as a Fader which creates a genuine analytical tension with the Closer pick.
T1:19.41% T2:23.49% T3:16.88% T4:16.48% T5:17.61% T6:15.93%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 450m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Endearing Smile | 47 | 61 | Closer |
2Moonveen Hijack | 55 | 36 | Fader |
3Diddly Squat | 54 | 36 | All-Rounder |
4Millhill Yogi | 8 | 100 | Closer |
5Autumn Meadow | 53 | 46 | All-Rounder |
6Speedy Rita | 44 | 54 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.