Pick 4 Starts Here
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Easy Rhib 1y 25 | G A Rees — 15% R82 W12 P49 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 26 (4) | 29 (2) | 19 (6) | 31 (1) | 30 (1) | 21 (4) | 27 (2) | 26 (2) | 29 (1) | 26 (2) | 51 | 43 | 17 | 51 | 26 | 37 | 2 | 13/8 | |
| 2 | ▶ Dot To Dashb 2y 14 | G A Rees — 15% R82 W12 P49 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 25 (5) | 32 (1) | 29 (2) | 30 (1) | 24 (2) | 25 (3) | 24 (3) | 24 (2) | 28 (2) | 25 (2) | 30 | 39 | 32 | 50 | 25 | 32 | 3 | 9/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Savana Tamborab 2y 5 | D Henry — 25% R104 W26 P64 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 25 (5) | 26 (5) | 25 (4) | 31 (4) | 31 (1) | 26 (1) | 24 (2) | 28 (4) | 30 (3) | - | 69 | 38 | 23 | 31 | 29 | 38 | 1 | 11/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Sober Cashoutd 4y 14 | L A Taylorson — 17% R234 W39 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 21 (6) | 27 (4) | 26 (4) | 31 (1) | 25 (5) | 23 (5) | 30 (2) | 21 (5) | 23 (4) | 26 (4) | 45 | 39 | - | 19 | 25 | 30 | 4 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Footfield Lottieb 2y 9 | L A Taylorson — 17% R234 W39 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 29 (1) | 23 (2) | 23 (3) | 22 (3) | 20 (3) | 25 (2) | 26 (2) | 26 (3) | 24 (3) | 29 (1) | 33 | 29 | 4 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 5 | 16/1 | |
Trap three runner at twenty-four point four percent shows dominant advantage in this Sheffield two-hundred-eighty metres D-four contest. Fader pace profile (early pace seventy-two, closing ratio zero) indicates strong early positioning with minimal late-race capability—natural speed dog suited to distance. Latest performance rating twenty-four is competitive in this lower grade. Composite thirty-eight and average twenty-nine position this runner competently within D-four parameters. Track specialist rating fifty-six point two supports Sheffield affinity. However, critical concern emerges from rank separation analysis: composite rank shows R-one at twenty-two point eight percent, R-two at eighteen point six, but R-three matches R-one at twenty-three point six percent—an unprecedented inversion where third-ranked dog equals first-ranked. This LOW SEPARATION scenario with R-three beating R-one creates unpredictable race dynamics. Pick selection based on trap advantage alone in a field lacking clear stratification.
Recent D-five win (rating thirty) is respectable but composite thirty-seven slightly trails pick. Trap one position (eighteen point one percent) significantly weaker than pick's trap three. Class upgrade to D-four adds uncertainty.
Weak trap two position (sixteen point seven percent) and composite thirty-two well below pick's thirty-eight. Trial recent means form data questionable.
Mid-range trap four (nineteen point zero percent) offers no structural advantage over pick's trap three. Composite thirty trails pick's thirty-eight. Class inconsistency raises form interpretation concerns.
Trap five position (twenty-one point zero percent) moderately strong but composite twenty-seven significantly trails pick's thirty-eight. Despite form consistency, composites gap is fatal.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 280m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.