Loading...
Follow Us On Facebook Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Nolas Conackd 2y 17 | J D Davy — 23% R56 W13 P29 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 52 | 56 (5) | 45 (5) | 62 (2) | 42 (5) | 73 (1) | 71 (1) | 50 (5) | 72 (1) | 69 (1) | 58 (2) | 63 | 62 | 54 | 60 | 62 | 62 | 1 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Constant Cocob 2y 26 | K Hodson — 20% R255 W51 P140 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 42 | 48 (4) | 68 (2) | 75 (1) | 75 (1) | 54 (3) | 61 (2) | 69 (1) | 48 (4) | 52 (4) | - | 31 | 13 | - | 21 | 57 | 34 | 5 | 13/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Windgap Frostb 3y 15 | L A Taylorson — 17% R234 W39 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 34 | 63 (2) | 51 (4) | 67 (2) | 52 (4) | 66 (2) | 53 (2) | 61 (2) | 61 (2) | 68 (1) | 48 (5) | 37 | 29 | 9 | 37 | 56 | 42 | 3 | 20/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Acomb Billyd 3y 9 | K J Ferguson — 31% R51 W16 P40 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 38 | 54 | 52 (3) | 68 (1) | 67 (2) | 57 (2) | 61 (3) | 67 (1) | 53 (3) | 48 (3) | 71 (1) | 40 (5) | 37 | 42 | - | 44 | 57 | 47 | 4 | 25/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Acomb Olgab 3y 15 | K J Ferguson — 31% R51 W16 P40 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 56 | 44 (6) | 73 (3) | 79 (1) | 68 (2) | 76 (1) | 75 (1) | 61 (3) | 41 (6) | 65 (1) | - | 60 | 52 | 58 | 62 | 57 | 58 | 2 | 5/6F | |
Nolas Conack is the standout performer in this field, carrying the highest composite score and a string of competitive efforts in A5 company. Drawn on the rail where trap 1 produces winners at 23.7% from 367 runs — the dominant position at Sheffield's 500-metre trip — everything structural lines up in his favour. His form trajectory shows sustained quality with consistent performances around the 60 mark, and his pace profile means he should be prominent throughout. The class edge over this field may not be overwhelming at 4-5 points, but combined with the best draw and proven course form, the convergence of factors makes a strong case.
Only 4 points behind the pick on composite with a closing finish that suits the track — the genuine danger if anything goes wrong for the favourite.
Poor draw, lowest composite in the field, and moderate recent form make it hard to see a path to victory here.
Fair draw but lacks the class to threaten the top-rated runners — likely to finish mid-pack based on current form.
Worst draw in the race and middling ratings make this a tough assignment despite some decent recent form.
T1 dominant at 23.7% from 367 runs — the pick benefits from the strongest structural position. Composite separation borderline at 4.1pp but the class gap between Nolas Conack and the field provides genuine differentiation.
T1:23.7% T2:15.9% T3:20.8% T4:16.3% T5:15.2% T6:19.5%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Nolas Conack | 55 | 31 | Fader |
2Constant Coco | 41 | 70 | Closer |
4Windgap Frost | 35 | 81 | Closer |
5Acomb Billy | 50 | 37 | All-Rounder |
6Acomb Olga | 54 | 50 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.