| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Loverly Jubleyb 3y 35 | E G Samuels — 16% R657 W104 P365 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 49 | 71 (2) | 62 (2) | 63 (2) | 30 (3) | 62 (3) | 59 (2) | 35 (2) | 34 (2) | 66 (2) | 57 (2) | 38 | 37 | 24 | 26 | 56 | 35 | 5 | 8/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Whisper Dollyb 3y 4 | M Lewis — 13% R75 W10 P34 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 49 | 29 (4) | 40 (1) | 36 (1) | 36 (2) | 17 (4) | 18 (2) | 49 (5) | 37 (2) | 29 (3) | 39 (2) | 47 | 39 | 34 | 44 | 33 | 36 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Whyaye Missusb 1y 6 | I J Barnard — 22% R275 W61 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 48 | 37 (2) | 26 (5) | 28 (4) | 37 (2) | 17 (4) | 74 (3) | 68 (4) | 80 (3) | 60 (4) | 65 (4) | 30 | 25 | 20 | 22 | 42 | 33 | 1 | 13/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Rockmount Nellieb 2y 17 | C R Morris — 29% R272 W78 P179 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 76 | 27 (5) | 27 (4) | 36 (2) | 84 (2) | 92 (1) | 72 (2) | 77 (2) | 87 (1) | 35 (2) | 48 (6) | 47 | 66 | 20 | 18 | 53 | 41 | 4 | 11/8F | |
| 5 | ▶ Headford Roseb 3yN/R 23 | I J Barnard — 22% R275 W61 P171 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 35 | 22 | 77 (2) | 62 (5) | 57 (3) | 68 (5) | 66 (2) | 99 (3) | 67 (1) | 57 (4) | 93 (5) | - | 11 | 26 | - | - | 70 | 35 | - | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Ballinabola Milab 3y 37 | K L Windebank — 17% R574 W96 P322 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 57 | 31 (6) | 50 (3) | 66 (1) | 29 (5) | 23 (6) | 39 (3) | 30 (5) | 41 (1) | 36 (1) | 52 (4) | 21 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 40 | 27 | 2 | 7/1 | |
The pick. Leads the composite model (41) in this race and brings the strongest track suitability figure of any runner — 66 out of 100 tells you she has built an excellent record at Yarmouth sprint racing and knows how to handle this course. The first-bend figure (76) is the best in the field by a considerable margin, meaning she has the ability to gain an early, dominant position in the race. Trained by C R Morris at 28% — the best available trainer on the card this evening. The recent run was disappointing (P27 pos 5 at D2 on June 1) and that is the caveat that keeps this in Tentative territory. But the profile — course form, first-bend rating, and trainer quality — suggests that run was not representative and a bounce-back is expected.
Outstanding raw ability from A2 form but zero sprint suitability — the potential to win or trail depending entirely on format suitability.
Class advantage from A4 form is real but the distance and format change is the question — place prospects on these figures.
Potentially good draw but the recent D2 form is disappointing — hard to promote above the leading selection.
Best raw speed but composite is fourth — the speed advantage alone may not be enough in a sprint contest.
Weakest model figure and poor recent form — very hard to recommend at any price in this company.
Sprint distance — model weights performance rating 70%. Track and distance suitability crucial for class-droppers.
T2 likely advantaged at 277m. Sprint formula applies — 70% performance rating.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 277m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.