Grumpy Turnip rates 103.9 with recent P72 A4 462m performance and strong distance suitability at 49. However, his other suitability scores are weak: trap 57, class 32, track 50, showing moderate overall alignment. Most critically, his recent P72 performance represents a placed finish but not a proven victory like Swift Qay's P79 win. His trap 1 position offers early-pace advantage on downhill but without a recent winning performance his form profile lacks the proven victory advantage of stronger competitors. Competent but not differentiated.

Swift Woman combines competitive speed rating 104.8 (field highest) with recent P74 A4 462m performance. However, her suitability scores reveal critical weaknesses: trap 37, class 15 (lowest in field—flags A4 grade misalignment), track 36, distance 34. Her low class suitability of 15 suggests potential A4 grade mismatch despite competitive speed rating. Her trap 2 position offers early-pace advantage on downhill. However, her weak class alignment and non-victorious recent form place her below Swift Qay's proven A4 victory. Her high speed rating positive but class suitability concern is significant.

Beaming Moscato shows the lowest speed rating in the field at 97.9, indicating below-average pace capability for A4 grade. His most recent form (P50 at HP 462m, 2026-03-16) shows weak performance at handicap grade, raising concerns about overall form. His suitability scores are weak across dimensions (trap 25, class 37, track 37, distance 39), indicating poor alignment with A4 sprint profile. His trap 3 position is neutral but cannot compensate for weak overall form and low speed rating. Cannot be recommended for A4 selection.

Grantstown Road rates 103.3 with recent P61 A4 462m performance and shows consistent mid-field form. His suitability scores are moderate (trap 34, class 25, track 41, distance 43), indicating reasonable A4 affinity but no standout alignment. His trap 4 position is neutral for Kinsley 462m geometry. While competent, his mid-field recent form lacks the proven victory distinction of Swift Qay. His form profile does not differentiate him from stronger competitors. Competent but not differentiated.

Emers Lola rates 101.6 (lowest in field) with recent P47 A4 462m performance showing weak form output. Her suitability scores reveal significant misalignment: trap 18 (lowest—major trap disadvantage), class 17, track 49, distance 35. Her critically low trap suitability of 18 flags major trap geometry issues. Her trap 5 position creates additional disadvantage on Kinsley downhill. The combination of lowest speed rating, weak recent form, and critically low trap suitability makes her unsuitable for A4 selection. Cannot be recommended.