Loading racecard
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Blue Starb 4y 18 | I Zivkovic — 13% R602 W81 P284 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 46 | 51 (2) | 38 (6) | 41 (6) | 48 (5) | 39 (6) | 48 (5) | 70 (1) | 41 (6) | 54 (4) | 48 (4) | 35 | 36 | 30 | 35 | 54 | 46 | 4 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Norristown Hydrob 1y 15 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 61 (2) | 32 (6) | 43 (1) | 36 (2) | 38 (1) | 48 (5) | 70 (1) | 69 (1) | 51 (4) | 31 (6) | 33 | 51 | - | - | 32 | 35 | 6 | 5/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Glenhead Sydneyd 3y 15 | I Zivkovic — 13% R602 W81 P284 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 50 | 48 (5) | 65 (3) | 47 (4) | 61 (2) | 58 (3) | 49 (4) | 48 (3) | 56 (4) | 57 (3) | 55 (4) | 35 | 34 | 26 | 34 | 57 | 47 | 3 | 7/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Hazelgrove Dawnb 2y 5 | W M Lyons — 19% R1040 W201 P556 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 38 | 54 (5) | 69 (6) | 84 (3) | 59 (1) | 82 (4) | 67 (1) | 78 (3) | 64 (1) | 65 (2) | - | 68 | 45 | 37 | 40 | 59 | 57 | 1 | 10/3 | |
| 5 | ▶ Grumpy Jackod 2y 17 | N Langley — 16% R207 W33 P115 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 51 | 59 (4) | 46 (6) | 63 (3) | 60 (4) | 66 (3) | 77 (1) | 75 (1) | 42 (6) | 46 (5) | 66 (2) | - | 29 | 9 | 25 | 54 | 42 | 5 | 2/1F | |
| 6 | ▶ Glenvale Jollyb 3y 16 | S Oakes — 15% R27 W4 P12 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 65 | 46 (5) | 73 (1) | 71 (1) | 60 (4) | 66 (2) | 32 (6) | 69 (2) | 33 (3) | 75 (1) | 73 (1) | 41 | 41 | 56 | 31 | 59 | 50 | 2 | 4/1 | |
Hazelgrove Dawn combines multiple factors that strongly align with 462m middle-distance requirements. Her suitability rating of 67 is the highest in the field by substantial margin, demonstrating strong track/distance/class affinity. Her average performance of 59 is joint-highest with Glenvale and demonstrates genuine consistency across recent races. Her form pattern shows strength concentrated in the strong range, indicating reliable outputs. Her proven closer profile suits the tactical positioning requirements of 462m on Kinsley. Her trap 4 position is neutral geometrically. At A5 grade, her combination of dominant suitability, consistent performance, and proven distance profile creates the strongest selection case.
Blue Star rates 99.8 with average performance of 54, which is respectable but not exceptional in an A5 field. Her form pattern shows significant variability with a major dip indicating inconsistency under pressure. Her suitability of 35 is adequate but not outstanding. Her trap 1 position offers early advantage on Kinsley but her overall form profile lacks the consistency needed to beat stronger rivals in this grade.
Norristown Hydro carries a critical form reliability flag with 3 of last 5 races being trials, making his open racing form assessment unreliable. While his rating of 101.7 is competitive, his average performance of 32 is the lowest in the field by significant margin. His suitability of 33 is modest. Most importantly, his trial contamination means his recent rating cannot be trusted as a guide to open racing capability.
Glenhead Sydney is a balanced all-rounder with rating of 99.9 and average performance of 57, placing her solidly mid-field. Her form pattern demonstrates consistency, indicating reliable performances. However, her suitability of 35 is modest relative to other runners, particularly compared to Hazelgrove's dominant 67 rating. Her trap 3 position offers reasonable geometric advantage on Kinsley 462m. While competent, her form profile does not present a clear edge over stronger rivals.
Grumpy Jacko rates highest at 102.6 with average performance of 54, suggesting strong recent form. However, he carries a critical assessment gap: zero trap suitability rating. This flags significant misalignment with track/distance/trap geometry or class profile. His form pattern shows variability with occasional strong outputs but inconsistent consistency. The zero suitability rating combined with form variability suggests he may be overrated for this specific A5 contest. Trap 5 disadvantage on Kinsley downhill exacerbates concerns.
Glenvale Jolly cannot be dismissed despite trap 6 disadvantage. His recent victory indicates current form at genuine peak performance level. His average performance of 59 matches Hazelgrove exactly. His form pattern shows current strength with recent high outputs despite earlier variability. Trap 6 on Kinsley 462m creates geometric disadvantage on downhill first bend, but his proven winning form and current trajectory create a genuine threat. His recent victory cannot be ignored.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Blue Star | 95 | 0 | Fader |
2Norristown Hydro | — | — | No data |
3Glenhead Sydney | 45 | 53 | All-Rounder |
4Hazelgrove Dawn | 43 | 64 | Closer |
5Grumpy Jacko | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
6Glenvale Jolly | 62 | 23 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.