Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Comer Samantab 3y 5 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 17 (5) | 15 (6) | 25 (1) | 16 (4) | 14 (5) | 18 (3) | 20 (3) | 15 (6) | 13 (6) | - | 17 | 22 | - | 11 | 34 | 26 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Burkos Bonnieb 3y 16 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 61 | 57 | 21 (4) | 17 (6) | 23 (4) | 28 (1) | 27 (1) | 22 (3) | 16 (6) | 20 (3) | 14 (5) | 12 (6) | 53 | 31 | 23 | 23 | 38 | 39 | 1 | 4/5F | |
| 3 | ▶ Hawkfield Ninab 2y 27 | D S Davy — 22% R417 W91 P260 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | 43 | 34 (5) | 14 (5) | 24 (6) | 14 (3) | 19 (3) | 17 (5) | 10 (6) | 36 (6) | 44 (3) | 15 (5) | 28 | 26 | 32 | 16 | 38 | 32 | 2 | 7/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Coolree Blueb 3y 15 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 26 (1) | 15 (4) | 20 (3) | 16 (4) | 19 (4) | 11 (6) | 14 (6) | 26 (1) | 14 (4) | 19 (4) | 21 | 19 | 32 | 17 | 35 | 28 | 6 | 5/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Dry Morningd 4y 24 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 24 (2) | 19 (3) | 17 (4) | 15 (6) | 16 (5) | 17 (4) | 15 (6) | 26 (1) | 20 (3) | 16 (5) | 23 | 18 | 15 | 22 | 39 | 31 | 3 | 3/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Pandy Jensond 5y 14 | C Darch — 22% R381 W85 P215 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | - | 14 (5) | 20 (4) | 25 (2) | 18 (5) | 15 (5) | 26 (1) | 18 (3) | 13 (6) | 12 (6) | 13 (5) | 27 | 26 | 15 | 11 | 34 | 29 | 5 | 7/1 | |
Comer Samanta has been very modest recently with figures rarely above 20, though trap 1 is one of the better draws at these conditions, winning at 20.5% from 88 runs. Her form reads 16, 20, 18, 29, 19 — that 29 aside, she's been struggling to break the 20 barrier. In a D6 sprint, anything can happen, but she looks outclassed by a couple of her rivals on raw ability. The draw gives her some structural support but the form doesn't inspire confidence.
Best peak form in the field and a capable trainer — the main threat if she runs to her best.
Classiest runner with the best draw — the clear standout on both form and structure.
Some form but drawn in the dead trap — structural headwind is severe.
One good run doesn't make a trend — needs to prove that last effort was genuine.
Was a decent performer but recent form collapse makes him hard to support.
LOW SEPARATION — rank 2 (21.2%) outperforms rank 1 (18.2%). Ratings are noise at D6 grade. Trap 4 and trap 1 are the structurally favoured positions.
T1:20.5% T2:12.1% T3:17.9% T4:22.5% T5:14.0% T6:20.4%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 260m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.