| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Grumpy Turnipb 3y 5 | N Langley — 16% R209 W33 P116 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 48 | 52 (3) | 44 (6) | 66 (2) | 69 (2) | 59 (2) | 55 (4) | 48 (4) | 78 (1) | 59 (3) | 54 (5) | 56 | 50 | 30 | 48 | 64 | 59 | 1 | 10/3 | |
| 2 | ▶ Ballymac Frisbyd 5y 47 | B Heaton — 15% R196 W30 P96 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 36 | 31 (6) | 42 (5) | 64 (2) | 80 (1) | 61 (3) | 50 (4) | 79 (1) | 72 (2) | 64 (3) | 70 (2) | 34 | 36 | 38 | 37 | 63 | 50 | 3 | 9/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Swift Lochd 2y 18 | J Robinson — 19% R298 W56 P170 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 55 | 41 (6) | 48 (4) | 44 (5) | 65 (2) | 53 (5) | 50 (6) | 53 (5) | 76 (1) | 44 (6) | 42 (5) | 31 | 29 | 18 | 27 | 55 | 44 | 4 | 7/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Conlig Annieb 2y 25 | D E Fradgley — 15% R97 W15 P52 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 49 | 96 (2) | 71 (4) | 65 (4) | 78 (4) | 87 (2) | 68 (3) | 78 (1) | 35 (6) | 49 (5) | 54 (3) | 37 | 39 | 23 | 37 | 59 | 49 | 6 | 2/1F | |
| 5 | ▶ Doublezero El Ehd 3y 26 | I Zivkovic — 13% R607 W81 P286 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 52 | 32 (2) | 22 (6) | 24 (5) | 33 (2) | 22 (4) | 76 (1) | 62 (2) | 60 (3) | 50 (5) | 36 (6) | 26 | 37 | 23 | 30 | 55 | 44 | 5 | 9/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Swift Qayd 3y 9 | J G Hurst — 18% R272 W49 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 56 | 52 (5) | 74 (1) | 58 (4) | 57 (3) | 55 (5) | 52 (4) | 62 (3) | 62 (3) | 64 (3) | 56 (3) | 37 | 36 | 29 | 34 | 58 | 48 | 2 | 5/2 | |
Grumpy Turnip is comfortably the best dog in this race on ratings, with an average performance well ahead of the rest of the field and a composite score that leads by a clear margin. Her all-rounder profile should see her handy throughout, and her suitability credentials are the strongest here with high marks for the track, distance and notably a trap suitability of 56 that suggests she handles the inside draw well individually. The elephant in the room is that trap 1 is structurally the worst-performing box at A4 462 metres, winning just 11.5% of the time from over 200 runs. Her class edge is genuine — a recent win at A5 with a 76 performance confirms her quality — but the structural headwind from the draw is a real concern. She needs things to go her way early.
Capable of the best performance in the race but too unreliable to take short — the danger if right.
Dominant trap and early pace but the Fader profile means he'll likely weaken when it matters.
Good trainer and showed ability when winning but closing style is wrong for this track.
Has the ability but fitness after a break is the big unknown — watching brief.
Strong early pace but the Fader profile at 462 metres means he'll weaken late — each-way at best.
T1 is structurally disadvantaged at 11.50% from 226 runs — the worst-performing box. T3 dominates at 21.85%. LOW separation means ratings are near-random; trap bias and pace should lead. The pick is drawn in the dead trap.
T1:11.50% T2:17.27% T3:21.85% T4:16.84% T5:15.22% T6:15.15%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Grumpy Turnip | 51 | 54 | All-Rounder |
2Ballymac Frisby | 49 | 55 | Closer |
3Swift Loch | 63 | 25 | Fader |
4Conlig Annie | 0 | 100 | Closer |
5Doublezero El Eh | 45 | 46 | All-Rounder |
6Swift Qay | 63 | 22 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.