Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
Retired Greyhounds Make Great Pets Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Sudoky Zoomb 4y 17 | P J Wilson — 19% R110 W21 P48 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 26 (2) | 18 (5) | 17 (6) | 30 (1) | 24 (3) | 18 (4) | 30 (1) | 23 (4) | 26 (3) | 23 (5) | 50 | 46 | 40 | 27 | 24 | 30 | 4 | 3/1 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Invincia Jewelb 4y 15 | J Daly — 19% R233 W44 P125 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | - | 26 (3) | 21 (3) | 20 (4) | 26 (2) | 26 (3) | 20 (4) | 51 (4) | 52 (5) | 39 (5) | 55 (3) | 45 | 29 | 14 | 33 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 5/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Coney Wonderwalld 4y 35 | S J Spillane — 14% R106 W15 P58 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | - | 14 (5) | 12 (6) | 25 (3) | 26 (5) | 30 (1) | 18 (5) | 19 (5) | 24 (3) | 25 (2) | 31 (1) | 59 | 30 | 41 | 24 | 23 | 28 | 3 | 5/2F | ||
| 4 | ▶ Sonic Pixied 2y 8 | L Cook — 18% R131 W24 P74 Trainer form — last 3 months | 55 | - | 31 (1) | 26 (3) | 18 (5) | 22 (5) | 21 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | 58 | 48 | - | 32 | 22 | 30 | 2 | 9/2 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Marco Mcrowd 4y 17 | K Wilton — 21% R166 W35 P88 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | - | 24 (2) | 25 (3) | 23 (4) | 20 (5) | 24 (3) | 25 (3) | 22 (5) | 30 (1) | 22 (4) | 27 (2) | 40 | 45 | 36 | 40 | 25 | 31 | 5 | 11/4 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Round The Bendb 2y 6 | J Llewellin — 16% R355 W57 P187 Trainer form — last 3 months | 44 | - | 24 (5) | 31 (1) | 28 (2) | 27 (2) | 25 (2) | 22 (4) | 25 (2) | 21 (5) | 18 (6) | 22 (4) | 48 | 44 | 23 | 19 | 22 | 27 | 6 | 7/1 | ||
Invincia Jewel is the clear class act in this field with an average performance head and shoulders above her rivals. She draws the best box at these conditions — trap 2 wins a remarkable 30% of 305-metre D4 races at Nottingham, nearly double the expected rate. She's a confirmed front-runner type who tends to weaken in the closing stages, but over this sharp sprint trip there simply isn't enough time for the fade to kick in. Her recent form includes a win and three placed efforts from five starts, and while the 18% trainer win rate is unspectacular, the structural alignment of best dog plus best draw is hard to argue against.
Strong draw with the best trap suitability in the race — the principal danger if the favourite misfires.
Reasonable draw but lacks the spark to take full advantage — a fringe place contender at best.
Well drawn with the fastest raw speed in the field but modest overall ability and weak trainer stats limit her prospects.
The draw is crippling at these conditions — faces an almost impossible task from trap 5 regardless of ability.
Structural mismatch is severe — the widest draw at a sprint where inside traps dominate leaves him with virtually no hope.
Extreme trap bias — traps 2-4 account for >80% of winners. T5 and T6 are near-dead draws. Sprint distance means early pace and position decide everything.
T1:16.33% T2:30.23% T3:26.09% T4:26.53% T5:6.38% T6:2.94%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 305m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.