GREYHOUNDHOMINGUK.COM
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Olwinn Seen Itb 3y 15 | D K Hurlock — 19% R903 W171 P500 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 50 | 55 (2) | 46 (4) | 51 (4) | 45 (5) | 51 (4) | 74 (1) | 40 (6) | 68 (1) | 62 (1) | 59 (2) | 36 | 36 | 36 | 33 | 53 | 44 | 1 | 8/1 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ My Agneb 1y 4 | P W Young — 18% R1290 W229 P713 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 49 | 61 (3) | 58 (2) | 60 (3) | 69 (1) | 61 (3) | 32 (6) | 48 (6) | 57 (4) | 51 (4) | 43 (6) | 36 | 37 | 27 | 27 | 56 | 47 | 3 | 2/1F | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Miami Beatd 1y 3 | P W Young — 18% R1290 W229 P713 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 52 | 56 (3) | 32 (6) | 62 (1) | 55 (1) | 29 (5) | 43 (3) | 49 (1) | 58 (1) | 25 (6) | - | 3 | 37 | 6 | 35 | 47 | 41 | 4 | 9/2 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Usykd 2y 16 | G E Evans — 21% R297 W62 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 47 | 46 (5) | 68 (1) | 40 (5) | 51 (4) | 50 (3) | 57 (2) | 51 (4) | 67 (1) | 47 (4) | 65 (1) | 2 | 30 | 21 | 29 | 53 | 36 | 6 | 4/1 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Big Time Roisinb 1y 1 | M E Wiley — 20% R510 W101 P267 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 38 | 5 | 6/1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Da Blue Tigerd 2y 7 | B Doyle — 13% R228 W29 P114 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 58 | 58 (2) | 43 (6) | 59 (3) | 46 (5) | 59 (4) | 64 (2) | 44 (5) | 55 (4) | 66 (2) | 62 (4) | 37 | 37 | 9 | 22 | 54 | 47 | 2 | 9/4 | - | |
The model's selection, and the choice is driven by pace and field speed metrics rather than composite alone — Olwinn posts composite 44 which is below the field leaders, but the ultra-composite algorithm at 400m weights early sectional pace and fieldSpeed heavily, and those readings justify this selection. Trap 1 wins 19.7% at A6 which is structurally average. Average performance of 53 is good for this grade. The model is telling us the pace profile here is more valuable than the composite differential.
Best draw plus highest avgP plus solid composite. Strongest analytical challenge to the model pick.
Mid-field on all metrics. Against.
Worst trap plus lowest comp. Against.
No performance average — major unknown. Against.
Strong comp and avgP but below-average trap. Interesting each-way case but not the top pick.
A6 borderline middle grade. Trap 2 dominant at 24.3%. Speed rank matters significantly at 400m. Composite R1 only modest advantage.
T1:19.7% T2:24.3% T3:20.5% T4:12.7% T5:14.5% T6:16.6%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Olwinn Seen It | 50 | 67 | Closer |
2My Agne | 50 | 55 | Closer |
3Miami Beat | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
4Usyk | 53 | 35 | All-Rounder |
5Big Time Roisin | — | — | No data |
6Da Blue Tiger | 60 | 23 | Fader |
Only runs at exactly 400m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.