| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Rathmeehan Honeyb 4y 35 | P Clarke — 14% R523 W75 P287 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 57 | 24 (4) | 19 (5) | 25 (3) | 39 (5) | 33 (4) | 33 (1) | 25 (1) | 22 (4) | 20 (5) | - | 38 | 36 | 33 | 37 | 28 | 32 | 1 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Drahbeg Dreamb 4yN/R 25 | P Clarke — 14% R523 W75 P287 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 24 (5) | 24 (5) | 24 (4) | 27 (2) | 31 (2) | 34 (1) | 30 (3) | 28 (4) | 33 (1) | - | 32 | 30 | 34 | 31 | 24 | 27 | - | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Random Izzyb 4y 25 | P Ward — 15% R218 W33 P111 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 24 (4) | 19 (6) | 23 (3) | 23 (5) | 22 (5) | 20 (6) | 24 (3) | 34 (1) | 21 (5) | 22 (5) | 32 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 23 | 27 | 5 | 13/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Classic Cindyb 4y 25 | J Pearson — 15% R205 W31 P103 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 43 | 19 (5) | 39 (6) | 17 (6) | 19 (6) | 15 (6) | 17 (6) | 46 (2) | 32 (1) | 14 (6) | 22 (2) | 35 | 23 | 12 | 25 | 23 | 26 | 2 | 10/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Kerabellec Nelld 4y 25 | P Ward — 15% R218 W33 P111 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 19 (5) | 33 (1) | 22 (4) | 33 (1) | 27 (3) | 33 (1) | 25 (4) | 19 (6) | 27 (3) | 23 (5) | 35 | 31 | 29 | 26 | 29 | 30 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Knockard Giftb 2y 7 | S A Saberton — 23% R394 W90 P253 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | - | 29 (2) | 24 (5) | 30 (2) | 22 (5) | 33 (1) | 19 (6) | 27 (3) | 30 (2) | 33 (1) | 35 (1) | 53 | 40 | 39 | 41 | 30 | 38 | 3 | 6/5F | |
Rathmeehan Honey emerges as the principal selection at Harlow 238m D4 primarily through trap architecture and confirmed front-runner profile. T1 at Harlow 238m D4 is dominant at 20.2% (935 runs), a significant sample size that provides genuine structural confidence. Her early pace profile (EP:57, PaceCon high) and front-runner pace classification (Pace:Front Runner) mean she will establish immediate command from the red trap. Her recent form includes a confirmed D4 position 1 win just two runs back, demonstrating capability at this exact grade and distance. Her performance rating of 29 sits mid-field, which is modest but sufficient for this lower grade. Her speed rating of 47 is competitive for D4 sprints. The trial run one of six form entries (P25) suggests ongoing preparation rather than long absence. Trap advantage at 20.2% versus the second-dominant T6 at 23.4% is marginal (3.2pp) but her front-runner profile compounds the advantage — she will break first from red, establish lane dominance in the opening 50m, and control wire-to-wire unless a specifically quick-breaking T6 dog accelerates past her (unlikely). Her suitability scores are balanced across track (36), distance (38), class (34) — nothing elite but sufficient. In a race where LOW SEPARATION (1.6pp) means composite rank is nearly irrelevant, trap position and pace profile are the decisive variables. She possesses both.
Form decline and weak trap position place outside top three contenders.
Trap disadvantage, class deficit, and inconsistent form place as outsider.
Class deficit and poor distance suitability create losing profile despite stepping up.
Recent D4 win is valuable but T5 DEAD trap (14.9%) creates 9.5pp structural disadvantage versus T6.
T6 advantage (23.4%) and strong form merit consideration, but Honey's front-runner T1 advantage is decisive.
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 238m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.