Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Marshalls Marvind 4y 35 | N J Deas — 17% R458 W76 P250 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 48 | 37 (3) | 45 (2) | 41 (4) | 26 (2) | 31 (6) | 42 (3) | 55 (2) | 19 (5) | 29 (2) | 30 (1) | 36 | 42 | 37 | 20 | 34 | 34 | 2 | 7/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Snaffi Mojob 5y 34 | P V Swadden — 21% R101 W21 P53 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 38 | 47 | 38 (2) | 53 (1) | 33 (6) | 37 (4) | 38 (4) | 29 (5) | 49 (2) | 29 (5) | 46 (3) | 32 (5) | 50 | 56 | 31 | 56 | 40 | 45 | 1 | 25/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Unknown Tulipb 3y 23 | D D Porter — 17% R526 W92 P291 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | 48 | 52 | 32 (5) | 38 (3) | 18 (5) | 35 (5) | 19 (5) | 28 (6) | 42 (6) | 48 (3) | 37 (2) | - | 15 | 13 | 22 | 13 | 36 | 28 | 5 | 6/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Bright Robynb 3y 14 | D D Porter — 17% R526 W92 P291 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 53 | 42 (2) | 41 (2) | 38 (5) | 49 (2) | 35 (5) | 29 (6) | 46 (3) | 44 (3) | 34 (6) | 45 (5) | 17 | 25 | 31 | 25 | 40 | 34 | 4 | 8/13F | |
| 5 | ▶ Trapstyle Sneezyd 2y 16 | J M Liles — 19% R433 W81 P226 Trainer form — last 3 months | 67 | 40 | 43 | 57 (1) | 37 (4) | 24 (3) | 24 (2) | 16 (5) | 21 (4) | 18 (5) | 53 (1) | 28 (5) | 31 (5) | 15 | 39 | 34 | 27 | 36 | 33 | 6 | 6/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Essex Abbieb 2y 15 | S J Roberts — 6% R17 W1 P8 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 56 | 41 (4) | 35 (3) | 33 (4) | 35 (5) | 43 (4) | 54 (4) | 23 (1) | 26 (3) | 24 (3) | - | 28 | 29 | 14 | 25 | 37 | 34 | 3 | 8/1 | |
Snaffi Mojo is the model's pick after a commanding A8 win last time with a 53 performance — the best single graded effort from any dog in this field. He's a closer who led all the way that day, suggesting tactical versatility beyond his stated profile. His track suitability of 56 and distance suitability of 56 are both the best in the field, confirming strong venue form. Trap 2 at 18.2% is neutral — not the structural advantage that trap 6 offers, but combined with his form and suitability, the overall picture makes sense. The low separation means margins are thin.
Dominant trap draw with strong early pace — the structural favourite despite the Fader tag.
Decent form but drawn in the dead trap — near impossible to win from trap 1 at A8 500m.
Improving form from a dominant trap — the draw is in her favour but suitability is a concern.
Consistent placer but the draw and suitability don't support a winning chance.
Capable on her day but too inconsistent from a weak draw to be confident.
Very low composite separation (3.8pp R1-R3) and relatively small sample (207 runs). Trap 6 is dominant at 27.3% — a huge structural advantage for Essex Abbie. Trap 1 is dead at 9.4%.
T1:9.4% T2:18.2% T3:22.2% T4:14.7% T5:12.8% T6:27.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Marshalls Marvin | 51 | 51 | All-Rounder |
2Snaffi Mojo | 48 | 76 | Closer |
3Unknown Tulip | 47 | 59 | Closer |
4Bright Robyn | 52 | 49 | All-Rounder |
5Trapstyle Sneezy | 49 | 44 | All-Rounder |
6Essex Abbie | 100 | 0 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.