| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Baggios Hazeb 2y 6 | D D Porter — 17% R521 W90 P286 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 20 (6) | 29 (3) | 29 (4) | 21 (5) | 36 (1) | 23 (5) | 28 (3) | 27 (5) | 34 (2) | 34 (3) | 72 | 50 | 39 | 45 | 33 | 41 | 5 | 5/2JF | |
| 2 | ▶ Stratton Girlb 3y 6 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 23 | 34 (2) | 32 (3) | 41 (1) | 33 (2) | 26 (4) | 37 (1) | 33 (2) | 35 (2) | 32 (2) | 31 (2) | 54 | 53 | 41 | 53 | 31 | 39 | 4 | 5/2JF | |
| 3 | ▶ Droopys Mikaylab 2y 37 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 50 | 20 (6) | 49 (5) | 65 (2) | 31 (2) | 31 (2) | 34 (5) | 47 (5) | 34 (6) | 71 (1) | 36 (6) | 57 | 49 | 40 | 61 | 43 | 47 | 2 | 7/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Flitwick Del Boyd 2y 16 | P T Henman — 19% R37 W7 P17 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 58 | 12 (6) | 25 (3) | 44 (5) | 49 (6) | 76 (1) | 49 (5) | 76 (1) | 60 (3) | 61 (3) | 72 (1) | 61 | 56 | 47 | 54 | 58 | 58 | 1 | 3/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Golden Bulletd 3y 24 | S J Roberts — 7% R15 W1 P7 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 5 | 26 (5) | 28 (6) | 36 (3) | 33 (2) | 37 (3) | 35 (2) | 34 (4) | 43 (4) | 37 (1) | - | 25 | 41 | - | 43 | 34 | 35 | 6 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Swift Wordd 3y 18 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 59 | 32 (1) | 17 (6) | 20 (6) | 23 (5) | 33 (1) | 27 (2) | 22 (5) | 37 (5) | 42 (4) | 32 (5) | 37 | 26 | 8 | 28 | 30 | 30 | 3 | 16/1 | |
Flitwick Del Boy is the class act here by a wide margin. His recent form includes two wins at A4 500m with performances of 76 — numbers that make this D3 270m field look like a different sport. He's dropping from A3/A4 level, and while the switch to sprints is a slight unknown, his all-rounder pace profile and bend rating of 58 suggest he should handle it comfortably. Trap 4 at 20.4% is solid — not the best draw but well within the dominant inside zone. The concern is his last two runs (44 and 49 at A3/A4) which were below his best, but even those figures would be competitive here.
Best-suited dog in the race from a strong draw — the genuine threat to the pick.
Best trap draw and good individual record from it — but closing speed at 270m is a tough ask.
Consistently placed but needs to find a new gear to beat the pick — likely place candidate.
Decent form undermined by a dead trap draw and terrible bend ability.
D4 winner stepping up from the worst trap draw — would need a big improvement.
Strong inside bias confirmed by 2,033 runs. The pick in trap 4 is at the edge of the dominant zone. His massive class advantage from A3/A4 500m makes him the standout.
T1:23.2% T2:23.2% T3:20.9% T4:20.4% T5:13.8% T6:13.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.