| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Ballymac Kurod 3y 36 | D S Davy — 22% R417 W91 P260 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 41 | 46 (4) | 25 (5) | 26 (5) | 30 (4) | 37 (1) | 19 (6) | 31 (3) | 26 (5) | 29 (3) | 53 (3) | 36 | 49 | 48 | 37 | 60 | 51 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Inner Cityb 3y 4 | A L Jeffery — 20% R388 W77 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 32 (3) | 29 (3) | 30 (3) | 31 (3) | 29 (3) | 25 (4) | 35 (1) | 32 (3) | 37 (1) | 31 (2) | 72 | 53 | 43 | 53 | 34 | 47 | 2 | 10/3 | |
| 3 | ▶ Oi Weaseld 4y 26 | A L Jeffery — 20% R388 W77 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 49 | 23 (4) | 18 (6) | 35 (5) | 40 (6) | 24 (4) | 38 (1) | 33 (1) | 22 (6) | 57 (3) | 22 (4) | 27 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 32 | 33 | 6 | 4/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ No Dont Panicd 3y 24 | A L Jeffery — 20% R388 W77 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 33 (6) | 28 (3) | 32 (3) | 43 (4) | 38 (1) | 92 (1) | 38 (2) | 33 (3) | 33 (2) | - | 54 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 31 | 41 | 3 | 11/4 | |
| 5 | ▶ Gizmo Cashoutd 2y 8 | M A Thomas — 29% R17 W5 P9 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | - | 39 (1) | 33 (3) | 32 (4) | 37 (1) | 29 (2) | 31 (2) | 38 (1) | 27 (5) | 64 (5) | 100 (1) | 34 | 69 | 47 | 64 | 46 | 48 | 1 | 15/8F | |
| 6 | ▶ Riot Co Martind 2y 18 | P T Maynard — 22% R212 W46 P126 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 100 | 28 (2) | 18 (6) | 26 (5) | 34 (4) | 30 (1) | 24 (2) | 24 (3) | 31 (3) | - | - | 26 | 29 | 6 | 37 | 29 | 29 | 5 | 14/1 | |
Gizmo Cashout emerges as pre-race selection through exceptional suitability architecture pairing (track:69, distance:64) with solid composite (48) and performance (46). The critical weakness is blank pace profile (EP/CS both zero), creating uncertainty regarding early running capability essential at 260m tight distance. Thomas's 18% strike rate provides modest training credibility. The pick represents best-available option in uncertain field lacking clear structural signals, but the absence of pace data prevents strong confidence assertion.
Closer in poor trap at tight distance. Form strong but structural profile fights geometry.
Good trap and speed but unclear pace profile creates prediction noise.
Balanced profile but insufficient form credentials for D3 competition.
Suitability consistency interesting but form and pace data create prediction doubt.
Dominant trap advantage offset by insufficient form credentials and unclear profile.
High R1 percentage (28.72%) indicates very clear winner separation at D3 level. T2 and T6 are strong positions. Gap of 15.2pp between R1 and R3 shows decisive first picks. This is a higher-clarity race than D4 or D5, yet lack of pace data across multiple runners creates prediction noise.
T1:15.96% T2:21.83% T3:19.49% T4:16.23% T5:17.72% T6:24.11%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 260m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.