Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Nitro Novab 2y 45 | A G Rawlings — 20% R228 W46 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 48 | 57 (2) | 53 (3) | 46 (5) | 68 (2) | 74 (1) | 45 (5) | 59 (2) | 43 (5) | 67 (1) | 33 (6) | 3 | 15 | 18 | 40 | 38 | 27 | 6 | 11/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Comer Sueb 2y 5 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 25 (3) | 29 (2) | 24 (4) | 20 (5) | 27 (3) | 25 (4) | 22 (5) | 21 (3) | 27 (3) | 31 (1) | 55 | 37 | 46 | 47 | 31 | 39 | 1 | 11/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ Leahs Mollyb 4y 24 | A L Jeffery — 20% R388 W77 P220 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | - | 16 (6) | 27 (4) | 25 (2) | 21 (3) | 18 (4) | 24 (4) | 29 (2) | 30 (2) | 20 (1) | - | 42 | 32 | 39 | 33 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 11/2 | |
| 4 | ▶ Crokers Wiffend 2y 7 | C Darch — 22% R381 W85 P215 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 51 | 30 (2) | 24 (4) | 29 (3) | 27 (5) | 25 (5) | 25 (5) | 42 (1) | 32 (4) | 88 (2) | 38 (1) | 44 | 49 | - | 34 | 44 | 44 | 4 | 10/3 | |
| 5 | ▶ Faradays Larryd 2y 9 | C Darch — 22% R381 W85 P215 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 52 | 31 (1) | 19 (6) | 55 (4) | 67 (1) | 20 (5) | 30 (1) | 25 (3) | 22 (6) | 26 (4) | - | 33 | 48 | 40 | 41 | 36 | 37 | 2 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Rapido Firminod 4y 24 | A N J Morgan — 14% R1165 W168 P574 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 19 (6) | 25 (5) | 24 (4) | 30 (3) | 100 (1) | 21 (3) | 23 (3) | 23 (4) | 20 (5) | 25 (4) | 44 | 25 | 27 | 27 | 22 | 28 | 3 | 7/2 | |
Comer Sue emerges as the pre-race pick despite modest individual metrics. The T2 positioning offers crucial structural shelter at Valley's chaotic tight layout. Pace data absence (EP/CS both zero) reflects limited recent race exposure, yet suitability pattern across trap (55) and track (37) indicates adaptive capability. Racing craft edge over the field justifies the model selection, though Valley's compressed 260m environment creates inherent volatility.
Best quality runner if early pace plays out neutrally. Monitor field structure.
T5 advantage and early pace create genuine threat if field setup favours front runners.
Closer at T1 in 260m chaos. Unlikely to find room at critical bend phases.
Lacks the early pace or structural advantage Valley rewards.
Lacks pace profile and form credentials for tight track environment.
Trap 5 shows strong statistical edge at this level. Comer Sue's T2 positioning offers relative safety vs chaos. The marked Closer bias in field (three runners with Closer/pure Closer profiles) creates unpredictability Valley is known for.
T1:15.43% T2:19.11% T3:16.54% T4:17.98% T5:24.55% T6:18.55%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 260m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.