| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Pulleen Mistyb 1y 4 | J J Luckhurst — 15% R279 W41 P129 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 36 (2) | 19 (6) | 36 (1) | 31 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 39 | 19 | 37 | 31 | 34 | 3 | 9/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Chic Le Freakb 5yN/R 14 | K A Schimmefennig — 4% R23 W1 P10 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 50 | 29 (5) | 30 (3) | 33 (3) | 31 (4) | 53 (5) | 64 (4) | 82 (1) | 77 (1) | 58 (3) | 53 (3) | 32 | 32 | 2 | 13 | 44 | 34 | - | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Wastehouse Krisb 3y 7 | B D O'sullivan — 18% R534 W98 P297 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 31 (4) | 29 (2) | 35 (2) | 19 (6) | 23 (6) | 31 (5) | 30 (4) | 41 (1) | 26 (5) | 26 (5) | 38 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 29 | 31 | 4 | 15/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Barnora Kateb 3y 24 | K A Schimmefennig — 4% R23 W1 P10 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 50 | 45 (3) | 61 (2) | 74 (1) | 51 (3) | 56 (3) | 69 (1) | 64 (5) | 38 (2) | 56 (2) | - | 37 | 33 | 28 | 23 | 57 | 37 | 1 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Rossa Annieb 3y 16 | B D O'sullivan — 18% R534 W98 P297 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | - | 30 (3) | 28 (4) | 27 (4) | 33 (3) | 30 (5) | 45 (1) | 42 (2) | 40 (3) | 32 (5) | 41 (2) | 23 | 33 | 17 | 20 | 33 | 29 | 2 | 11/8F | |
| 6 | ▶ Barnora Noeld 3y 15 | K A Schimmefennig — 4% R23 W1 P10 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 34 (3) | 27 (5) | 26 (6) | 40 (1) | 35 (3) | 34 (3) | 19 (6) | 25 (5) | 40 (2) | 36 (3) | 30 | 27 | 25 | 19 | 31 | 28 | 5 | 5/1 | |
The class argument here is overwhelming. An average performance rating of 57 — the highest in this field by a massive 13-point margin — tells the story clearly. At sprint distances, where races are decided in seconds, a dog with this level of form advantage over D2 company simply needs to break cleanly and the race is hers. The trap four draw is workable at 19.2 per cent for the trip, not the best box but far from a barrier. Bend rating of 50 shows she is not a slow beginner either. This is a case where the ratings make the decision — the form gap is too wide to argue against.
Best draw and second-best form in the field — clear danger to the selection if she gets a clean break.
Not enough quality to challenge. Makes up the numbers in this company.
Below-average form makes this a difficult ask even in D2 company.
Worst draw at a sprint trip. Recent form encouraging but structural disadvantage is too great.
Same kennel as the pick but vastly inferior ratings. Ranks last on form.
T2 best draw at 277m (22.2%). Sprint trips at CP decided at the first bend — early pace essential.
T1:18.5% T2:22.2% T3:18.5% T4:19.2% T5:13.0% T6:17.7% — T2 dominant sprint draw, T5 worst
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 277m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 277m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.