Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Bells Babeb 2y 17 | D S Davy — 22% R417 W91 P260 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 60 | 52 | 67 (2) | 54 (4) | 85 (1) | 23 (1) | 67 (2) | 63 (2) | 24 (4) | 95 (2) | 66 (3) | 84 (1) | 61 | 52 | 39 | 45 | 63 | 59 | 2 | 11/10F | |
| 2 | ▶ Southfield Kateb 2y 6 | J A Danahar — 18% R312 W55 P177 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 29 | 51 | 54 (4) | 50 (4) | 41 (5) | 73 (1) | 47 (5) | 53 (5) | 52 (4) | 79 (1) | 76 (1) | 57 (2) | 45 | 35 | 34 | 23 | 57 | 48 | 3 | 7/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Marinas Maltab 3y 5 | D S Davy — 22% R417 W91 P260 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 50 | 67 (4) | 23 (1) | 70 (2) | 19 (2) | 51 (5) | 70 (2) | 72 (2) | 70 (3) | 66 (4) | 74 (2) | 61 | 47 | - | 47 | 66 | 61 | 1 | 13/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Swift Luleeb 3y 15 | M Simpson — 28% R18 W5 P8 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | 56 | 46 (5) | 59 (4) | 64 (5) | 85 (1) | 45 (4) | 34 (1) | 31 (1) | 21 (2) | 21 (5) | 14 (6) | 28 | 51 | - | 17 | 35 | 34 | 5 | 5/2 | |
| 5 | ▶ Affleck Nashwand 2y 34 | C Darch — 22% R381 W85 P215 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 45 | 33 (2) | 24 (6) | 29 (4) | 27 (5) | 39 (1) | 23 (5) | 30 (3) | 30 (3) | 42 (6) | 57 (4) | 37 | 30 | 33 | 29 | 39 | 36 | 4 | 16/1 | |
Elite closer with excellent sectional progression and dominant field speed positioning indicating clear class superiority. Composite score of 61 reflects authority at A4 grade. Trap three positioning, though historically modest at this venue, does not diminish her closing profile which is the strongest in the race. Form trajectory 51→63 shows significant improvement with each outing. Her finishing speed from off-pace at Valley will prove decisive once the pace moderates.
Form and trap position are positives but closing speed shortfall is decisive.
Suitability metrics indicate non-competitive against this field.
Fader profile at tight track plus weak trap position makes competitive case difficult.
Insufficient suitability and form against elite field.
Rank 1 composite dogs win 23.98% from 342 runs — 7.7pp above the field. Separation is clear, favouring highest-rated runner. Trap 3 shows historical weakness at 12.87% but this is confounded by class mix; better dogs can overcome draw disadvantage.
T1: 18.75% | T2: 17.37% | T3: 12.87% | T4: 13.33% | T5: 18.75% | T6: 16.92%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 460m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Bells Babe | 0 | 100 | Closer |
2Southfield Kate | 46 | 33 | All-Rounder |
3Marinas Malta | 50 | 56 | Closer |
4Swift Lulee | 63 | 38 | Fader |
5Affleck Nashwan | 51 | 50 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.