| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Wraysbury Bandb 4y 36 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 60 | 44 (3) | 39 (4) | 60 (1) | 41 (1) | 54 (2) | 37 (1) | 35 (6) | 39 (4) | 37 (1) | 31 (2) | 38 | 38 | 40 | 45 | 58 | 52 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 2 | ▶ Savana Sarokod 4y 29 | P Tsirigotis — 20% R56 W11 P28 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 36 (1) | 35 (1) | 26 (4) | 28 (5) | 29 (4) | 29 (4) | 32 (3) | 28 (4) | 26 (5) | 37 (1) | 41 | 44 | 40 | 43 | 60 | 54 | 1 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Devon Sunsetd 3y 7 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | - | 30 (3) | 32 (1) | 28 (3) | 28 (4) | 22 (4) | 25 (3) | 21 (6) | 33 (2) | 30 (4) | 31 (3) | 38 | 32 | 35 | 32 | 55 | 48 | 6 | 9/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Donishall Ringd 1y 35 | V A Lea — 15% R191 W29 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 58 (1) | 47 (3) | 24 (4) | 28 (4) | 39 (1) | 27 (4) | 29 (4) | 33 (3) | 33 (2) | - | - | 34 | - | 34 | 60 | 51 | 2 | 2/1F | |
| 5 | ▶ Hitthelids Paulod 3y 16 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 40 | 58 (4) | 80 (1) | 77 (1) | 43 (5) | 72 (1) | 40 (6) | 42 (5) | 65 (2) | 50 (4) | 62 (3) | 39 | 41 | - | 38 | 59 | 52 | 5 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Trapstyle Weeb 3y 16 | J M Liles — 19% R423 W79 P222 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | - | 42 (5) | 40 (3) | 40 (5) | 47 (3) | 49 (2) | 50 (2) | 31 (3) | 32 (3) | 32 (3) | 31 (2) | 38 | 34 | 45 | 36 | 63 | 54 | 3 | 7/2 | |
Best speed in the field at S53 drawn in the best trap — T2 wins 23.56% in D3 270m from 382 runs. CD form is excellent: 2nd, 2nd at D3, with only a 6th at D2 (higher grade). Form range 44-69 shows some volatility but the two recent 69 and 64 runs are solid. P60 is joint-best with Donishall Ring. Trainer P Tsirigotis at 13% is poor but the structural advantages (speed + trap) override. When a dog is consistently 2nd at a grade from the best trap position, the win should come.
DANGER: Best improving form (55→65) and D2-to-D3 class drop are powerful signals. Zero trap/class suit data means we're guessing about how he handles T4 at D3, but the trajectory is undeniably upward.
Trial form was promising (two wins, a 2nd) but the 28 and 44 perfs since suggest something is fundamentally wrong. Too risky to back.
Weak across all metrics. CD 3rd shows he can be competitive in weak D3 fields but nothing suggests a winning effort here.
The 81 perf proves he has more ability than anyone here. But 41 and 49 in the same sequence, plus worst trap, make him impossible to trust.
Best perf (P63), most consistent form, best CD record — but T6 at 14.08% is a dealbreaker for a sprint. He'll place again (probably 2nd or 3rd) but winning from T6 at 270m needs a miracle.
T2 best trap at 23.56% from 382 runs. T5 and T6 are the graveyard at 13.76% and 14.08%. Very even field on paper — traps 1-4 all between 20-24%.
T1:21.83% T2:23.56% T3:21.99% T4:20.36% T5:13.76% T6:14.08%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.