SIS Racing @ Thurles A3//A4 570
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Coolisteigerubyb 2y 22 | - | - | 48 | - | 70 (2) | 52 (5) | 55 (5) | 64 (3) | 54 (4) | 67 (1) | 61 (2) | 54 (4) | 51 (5) | 57 (4) | 22 | - | - | - | 60 | 42 | 4 | - | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Memories Lineoutb 2y 23 | - | - | 32 | - | 52 (6) | 76 (2) | 84 (1) | 81 (1) | 56 (5) | 68 (2) | 54 (4) | 41 (6) | 57 (4) | 48 (5) | 34 | 22 | - | - | 65 | 37 | 6 | - | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Bogger Bertd 2y 23 | - | - | 54 | - | 67 (3) | 57 (5) | 61 (4) | 67 (3) | 44 (6) | 90 (1) | 56 (4) | 77 (1) | 78 (1) | 70 (2) | 6 | 33 | 17 | - | 65 | 47 | 2 | - | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Gortkelly Shemd 2y 25 | - | - | 61 | - | 68 (4) | 65 (4) | 85 (1) | 66 (4) | 64 (4) | 78 (3) | 68 (3) | 81 (1) | 74 (2) | 62 (2) | 9 | 11 | 17 | - | 71 | 51 | 1 | - | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Marlhill Betsyb 2y 23 | - | - | 55 | - | 54 (5) | 59 (4) | 61 (5) | 61 (4) | 71 (2) | 64 (2) | 68 (2) | 58 (4) | 51 (4) | - | 40 | - | 15 | - | 60 | 41 | 3 | - | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Supersonic Tessb 1y 23 | - | - | 44 | - | 58 (4) | 62 (4) | 73 (3) | 60 (4) | 70 (1) | 52 (4) | 52 (3) | - | - | - | 13 | 2 | - | - | 62 | 39 | 5 | - | - | |
The standout on every significant metric in this field — best average performance rating at 71, highest speed rating at 61, and the top composite score. Six recent runs showing 69, 65, 85, 66, 64, and 78, with the most recent a fourth place at A4 scoring 69. The peak run of 85 shows what this dog is capable of when everything clicks. The caveat is no recorded experience at the 570 metre distance, but this is a step of only 45 metres beyond the 525 the dog has consistently raced at, and the quality advantage over the field is substantial. When the best dog on form, speed, and the composite all align, the pick writes itself — even accounting for the distance question mark.
Strong all-round profile with good speed and course form. The main danger to the selection, with a high peak run of 90 showing real class.
Good recent form but the speed is below the top dogs and the grade step up from A5 to A3 is significant.
Course experience but lowest speed rating in the field by far. Recent form going the wrong way for this grade.
Consistent enough runner with decent course form but not the form to beat the selection at this level.
Below-average speed, limited course experience, and stepping up in grade and distance. Too much against at this level.
Only 36 historical runs at 570m A3 — completely unreliable. Cannot draw meaningful conclusions from this sample. Analysis falls back to form, speed, and performance ratings.
T1:0% T2:33.3% T3:16.7% T4:0% T5:33.3% T6:16.7%
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.