Loading...
PK Electrical A4 525 Semi-Final
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Rackethall Nedd 1y 1 | Martin Lanney — 0% R8 W0 P3 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 51 (5) | 33 (6) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 43 | 36 | 3 | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Ravenswood Cassb 1y 13 | Gerard Barber — 67% R3 W2 P2 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 55 (5) | 49 (6) | 68 (3) | 65 (1) | 41 (4) | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 28 | - | - | 56 | 44 | 2 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Rainnspainb 1y 23 | John Downey — 0% R5 W0 P3 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | - | 61 (5) | 81 (1) | 71 (3) | 68 (1) | 48 (3) | 52 (3) | - | - | - | - | 1 | 28 | 20 | 33 | 65 | 40 | 4 | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Desert Trendd 2y 26 | Declan Crossan — 0% R1 W0 P1 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 64 | - | 83 (1) | 76 (1) | 67 (2) | 49 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 40 | - | - | 71 | 55 | 1 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Benbradagh Bonod 1y 17 | - | - | 45 | - | 68 (1) | 69 (2) | 64 (2) | 47 (4) | 66 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | - | 53 | 64 | 47 | 5 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Melodys Bockod 1y 34 | - | - | 47 | - | 62 (2) | 57 (2) | 52 (3) | 44 (3) | 35 (5) | 35 (6) | - | - | - | - | 17 | 12 | - | 30 | 50 | 35 | 6 | - | |
Desert Trend holds the highest composite score in this race (55) and the best average performance (71), and arrives on the back of sharp winning form. His 29 May Dundalk 400m S4 win was achieved despite a slow away (perf 83, SlAw/FinWl) — demonstrating strong finishing ability. Prior to that he won back-to-back at Lifford 325m S5 in May (76 and 67 perfs). Track suitability of 40 at Dundalk is solid. Distance suitability is 0 for 525m but this may simply reflect limited data at this exact trip — he has enough raw ability to handle the step up. The composite model puts him clearly ahead on a multi-dimension ranking. Trainer is on 0% which tempers enthusiasm, and his step from 400m winners to 525m A4 competition is a question mark. However the composite leadership, best avgPerf, and sharp recent winning form make him the selection — the model rewards his across-the-board quality even where trip-specific data is thin.
Won this exact grade, distance, and track two runs ago (81 perf). Genuine danger and could repeat, but recent fifth suggests possible dip in form. Monitoring closely.
Lowest avgPerf in the race, trainer on 0%, and only two poor runs on record. Cannot assess meaningfully. No confidence.
Some 525m Dundalk A4 form but recent performances have declined. Second-tier option in this field.
Grade jump from A7 to A4 is too steep at this stage. Weakest trap draw and low track suitability compound the concern.
Consistently placed but well beaten at A5/A6 level. Stepping up to A4 is too much of a stretch. Clear outsider.
Dundalk 525m has the flattest trap distribution in the dataset — only 2.9pp separates T1 (18.8%) from T5 (15.9%). T1 holds a marginal structural advantage but is not dominant. Form and ability are the primary differentiators.
T1:18.8% T2:17.5% T3:17.8% T4:16.3% T5:15.9% T6:16.0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 525m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Only runs at exactly 525m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.