Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Jacktavern Smashd 2y 13 | D D Knight — 18% R235 W43 P137 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 32 (5) | 27 (1) | 24 (3) | 24 (3) | 23 (3) | 20 (2) | 16 (3) | 30 (5) | 24 (1) | - | 39 | 32 | - | 34 | 25 | 30 | 6 | 9/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Agincourt Mavkab 4y 14 | R H Tungatt — 17% R48 W8 P32 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 26 (3) | 35 (1) | 31 (1) | 31 (2) | 29 (3) | 35 (1) | 31 (2) | 35 (1) | 31 (1) | 27 (3) | 43 | 40 | 34 | 49 | 31 | 38 | 5 | 7/2 | |
| 3 | ▶ St Crispins Dayd 3y 3 | R H Tungatt — 17% R48 W8 P32 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 30 (2) | 32 (2) | 28 (3) | 26 (3) | 32 (1) | 24 (3) | 15 (5) | 31 (2) | 28 (2) | 26 (3) | 71 | 40 | 26 | 34 | 27 | 38 | 2 | 2/1F | |
| 4 | ▶ Burnpark Gloryb 4y 23 | P M Donovan — 18% R125 W23 P75 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 13 (6) | 26 (3) | 24 (4) | 30 (2) | 27 (4) | 22 (5) | 29 (3) | 33 (2) | 33 (4) | 33 (3) | 59 | 17 | 26 | 14 | 29 | 30 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Easy Lashesd 3y 7 | D D Knight — 18% R235 W43 P137 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 22 (5) | 24 (5) | 27 (3) | 28 (3) | 27 (3) | 25 (5) | 35 (1) | 27 (5) | 35 (1) | 32 (2) | 52 | 42 | 29 | 45 | 29 | 38 | 4 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Honey Expertd 3y 34 | G S Byford — 22% R233 W52 P138 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | - | 42 (6) | 49 (3) | 26 (4) | 35 (1) | 29 (3) | 28 (4) | 22 (5) | 52 (4) | 67 (2) | 54 (3) | 46 | 37 | 25 | 22 | 48 | 42 | 1 | 3/1 | |
Honey Expert has the best form in this field by a considerable margin after producing several solid efforts at a higher grade recently. A confirmed front-runner from trap 6 which is the second-strongest structural position at these conditions. The class advantage of 19 points above the field average on performance is substantial and at a sprint distance where early pace decides everything, the combination of speed and the second-best draw makes a strong case. Track and distance suitability are moderate but the raw ability advantage should compensate. The sprint trip means the fading concern is far less relevant than at 500 metres.
The structural data strongly favours the rail at sprint distances. Despite modest form, the trap position alone makes this the danger.
Dead draw from trap 2 and modest form. Very hard to make a case for this runner at these conditions.
Strong individual trap record against a weak aggregate position. The personal form from box three is encouraging but the structural data gives pause.
Poor recent form and limited venue credentials. Needs significant improvement to feature at this level.
Drawn in the weakest structural position with no evidence the individual form can overcome it. Very hard to back.
Extreme trap bias at D3 285m with T1 winning nearly a third of all races and T6 also very strong. T5 is catastrophically weak at under 10%. Composite rank 3 actually outperforms rank 1 which confirms ratings have no predictive value at these conditions. This is entirely about trap draw and speed at a sprint distance.
T1:30.8% T2:14.6% T3:15.1% T4:18.7% T5:9.8% T6:25.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 285m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.