The Future Of Racing: PGR TV Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Stellas Charmb 1y 4 | E O Driver — 21% R319 W66 P198 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 46 | 41 | 64 (3) | 66 (3) | 61 (2) | 73 (5) | 70 (4) | 100 (1) | 60 (1) | 47 (2) | 55 (5) | - | 30 | 43 | - | 45 | 55 | 50 | 5 | 7/4F | |
| 2 | ▶ This Is Ezed 3y 17 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 43 | 87 (1) | 64 (3) | 31 (4) | 51 (4) | 87 (6) | 83 (1) | 20 (1) | 69 (2) | 83 (2) | - | 63 | 32 | 18 | 42 | 57 | 53 | 2 | 11/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Saheel Charmb 3y 24 | P J Wilson — 19% R110 W21 P46 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 47 | 50 (5) | 36 (6) | 18 (5) | 18 (4) | 53 (4) | 63 (3) | 70 (2) | 81 (1) | 13 (6) | 81 (1) | 32 | 23 | 27 | 31 | 46 | 40 | 6 | 8/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Thequietmand 2y 8 | J Gray — 14% R224 W31 P127 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 55 | 62 (4) | 82 (6) | 57 (1) | 45 (4) | 60 (6) | 57 (3) | 60 (5) | 82 (5) | 50 (1) | - | 51 | 49 | 14 | 31 | 61 | 55 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Namelessd 2y 7 | M T Munslow — 23% R148 W34 P93 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 62 | 60 (3) | 69 (2) | 66 (2) | 59 (3) | 48 (6) | 62 (3) | 41 (6) | 75 (2) | 59 (4) | 52 (5) | 47 | 44 | 30 | 43 | 65 | 58 | 1 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Kind Ciand 5y 44 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 50 | 58 (5) | 60 (4) | 64 (4) | 20 (2) | 80 (1) | 55 (4) | 78 (2) | 72 (3) | 65 (5) | 81 (1) | 34 | 34 | 45 | 35 | 70 | 58 | 4 | 5/1 | |
Swift Nameless is projected to lead this field with explosive early pace and the best bend rating in the race at 62, which is crucial on Nottingham's tight first bend. His last three A3 runs tell the same story — leading to the run-in before being caught close home, including a promising 75 when second last time. The concern is the pace profile — he fades consistently late on, as confirmed by three identical race comments about leading then being caught. But with trainer Mark Munslow operating at 32% and genuine early pace to burn, he just needs to build enough of a lead through the first two bends to hold on. If he can extend the gap by a length before the closing stages, the chasers may not catch him.
The class act — five points above the field on average performance and finishing strongly.
Stepping up in class from A4 — likely to need things to fall right to feature.
Useful A3 form but returning from trials — needs to show that level again.
Form in freefall with two consecutive 18s — very hard to make a case here.
Sits in the best draw and has ability but too inconsistent to fully trust.
T4 is the best-performing draw with 21.8% from 340 runs. T1 and T5 are weakest at 15.7% and 16.1% respectively. Speed rank shows strong separation (R1 21.6% vs R3 15.8%).
T1:15.7% T2:18.5% T3:19.9% T4:21.8% T5:16.1% T6:19.6%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Stellas Charm | 40 | 61 | Closer |
2This Is Eze | 63 | 100 | All-Rounder |
3Saheel Charm | 49 | 37 | All-Rounder |
4Thequietman | 51 | 39 | All-Rounder |
5Swift Nameless | 77 | 0 | Fader |
6Kind Cian | 44 | 63 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.