Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Annie Eva Aftab 2y 17 | J J Heath — 21% R367 W77 P230 Trainer form — last 3 months | 45 | 63 | 29 (6) | 20 (5) | 25 (2) | 24 (3) | 20 (5) | 27 (2) | 22 (4) | 16 (5) | 18 (5) | 30 (1) | 25 | 28 | - | - | 24 | 32 | 4 | 5/2 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Chisem Bubblesb 1y 15 | R J Holloway — 22% R296 W65 P162 Trainer form — last 3 months | 55 | 51 | 32 (4) | 29 (4) | 29 (4) | 23 (6) | 36 (3) | 45 (1) | 26 (4) | 32 (5) | - | - | 3 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 31 | 37 | 2 | 3/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Sladeys Knightd 3y 7 | S Maplesden — 17% R274 W46 P148 Trainer form — last 3 months | 47 | 49 | 33 (2) | 26 (5) | 42 (1) | 30 (3) | 32 (4) | 26 (6) | 34 (3) | 29 (5) | 23 (6) | 43 (1) | 8 | 17 | 20 | 18 | 31 | 34 | 3 | 9/2 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Yassoo Mellb 3y 110 | G S Byford — 22% R227 W51 P133 Trainer form — last 3 months | 58 | 49 | 50 (1) | 47 (1) | 42 (2) | 35 (3) | 33 (4) | 34 (3) | 35 (2) | 32 (4) | 43 (1) | 37 (2) | 28 | 31 | 48 | 28 | 35 | 46 | 1 | 6/5F | ||
| 6 | ▶ Roanna Dixieb 3y 4 | B S Green — 20% R417 W85 P241 Trainer form — last 3 months | 46 | 51 | 36 (2) | 29 (4) | 27 (5) | 26 (5) | 28 (4) | 33 (2) | 24 (6) | 37 (3) | 32 (3) | 21 (5) | 17 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 28 | 32 | 5 | 14/1 | ||
Won an A11 at Hove just two weeks ago (3 May, P42, pos 1), which is the standout recent form line in this race. The A11 historical anomaly at Hove — where the second-ranked composite dog wins at over 30% — works in his favour given his middling ratings place him firmly in that second-tier bracket against Yassoo Mell. Trap three carries a solid 21.1% win rate at A11 here. His form trajectory of P26/P42/P30/P32 shows he finds his best at this grade level and the recent win confirms current well-being. Track suitability of 17 is modest but he has demonstrated the ability to score on this surface, which counts for more than statistical suitability in this grade.
Statistically most likely to outrate the field on paper but the A11 anomaly at Hove historically penalises the top-rated dog — watch closely as danger, not selection.
Sharp first-bend but zero distance suitability and weak overall ratings make this a hold at best — early pace only.
Speed is there but poor suitability scores and a weak draw make this an unlikely winner despite the pace ability.
Back-to-back fifths at A11 Hove, near-zero course suitability, and a poor trap make this a straightforward pass.
A11 at Hove is one of the most anomalous grades in the UK — the second-best rated dog wins at 30.5%, vastly outperforming the top-rated dog at 18.9%. This inverts normal selection logic and means backing the nominally second-best runner is statistically the sharpest play.
T1:23.4% T3:21.1% T5:19.8% T2:17.2% T6:14.4%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Annie Eva Afta | 65 | 0 | Fader |
2Chisem Bubbles | 56 | 28 | Fader |
3Sladeys Knight | 49 | 54 | All-Rounder |
5Yassoo Mell | 46 | 85 | Closer |
6Roanna Dixie | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.