| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Hi Land Missb 4y 43 | A J Taylor — 13% R338 W45 P158 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 50 | 44 (4) | 36 (4) | 52 (5) | 39 (2) | 48 (4) | 44 (2) | 49 (5) | 42 (4) | 52 (5) | - | 48 | 35 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 40 | 2 | 11/8F | |
| 2 | ▶ Bling Bling Mhib 1y 4 | J J Heath — 21% R377 W81 P238 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 37 | 61 (3) | 59 (1) | 38 (5) | 48 (4) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 61 | - | 40 | - | 15 | 5 | 4/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Courancove Catd 2y 17 | M J Richards — 16% R165 W27 P86 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 58 | 56 (1) | 40 (3) | 46 (3) | 34 (5) | 45 (3) | 40 (4) | 41 (5) | 60 (1) | 46 (4) | 39 (5) | 32 | 27 | 23 | 17 | 45 | 38 | 4 | 6/1 | |
| 4 | ▶ Stefans Bombb 2y 18 | A J Taylor — 13% R338 W45 P158 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 50 | 49 (2) | 47 (4) | 49 (2) | 59 (2) | 37 (4) | 57 (1) | 51 (1) | 48 (1) | 35 (4) | 38 (2) | 41 | 46 | 15 | 51 | 47 | 47 | 3 | 5/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Courancove Wildd 2y 16 | M J Richards — 16% R165 W27 P86 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 57 | 48 | 31 (5) | 39 (4) | 37 (4) | 56 (3) | 41 (4) | 47 (2) | 46 (2) | 38 (6) | 54 (4) | 40 (5) | 50 | 46 | 28 | 45 | 47 | 47 | 1 | 9/4 | |
Stefans Bomb has the strongest recent form in this race with an average performance of 47.8, boosted by a superb 59 rating when winning three starts ago. His second over course and distance last time was a solid effort despite crowding at the first bend, and his consistency across the last five — three top-two finishes — marks him out in a field full of inconsistent types. The draw in trap 4 is slightly below average for this grade but on a fair track like Hove 500m the difference between traps is modest. His experience with six course and distance runs and his form edge should be enough, though the low separation at this grade makes this no certainty.
Best draw in a race where ratings mean little — could bounce back from recent poor runs if she gets a clean break.
Promising young dog with two wins from three starts but likely still below this grade on ability — watching brief.
Has the ability on her best day but inconsistent and drawn where trouble could find her again.
Form in freefall with his last two ratings well below the field average — hard to support until he shows signs of revival.
Relatively flat trap bias with T1 slightly favoured. Composite rankings are completely inverted — the top-rated dog historically wins LESS than rank 2 or rank 3. Ratings are essentially noise at this grade and distance. Form trajectory and course knowledge matter more.
T1:23.76% T2:20.65% T3:18.06% T4:17.42% T5:19.01% T6:20.89%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Hi Land Miss | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
2Bling Bling Mhi | 44 | 55 | Closer |
3Courancove Cat | 62 | 0 | Fader |
4Stefans Bomb | 56 | 9 | Fader |
5Courancove Wild | 33 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.