Intertrack Vs Dunstall Park
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Perdeyb 2y 18 | J Llewellin — 17% R365 W61 P195 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 47 | 46 | 56 (4) | 46 (4) | 52 (3) | 61 (4) | 56 (5) | 66 (2) | 81 (1) | 76 (1) | 62 (3) | 64 (3) | 40 | 60 | - | 37 | 68 | 60 | 1 | 9/2 | |
| 2 | ▶ Oode Lallyd 4y 23 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 50 | 47 (6) | 33 (6) | 44 (5) | 14 (6) | 22 (1) | 51 (5) | 15 (5) | 14 (5) | 68 (3) | 83 (1) | 34 | 17 | 18 | 14 | 37 | 32 | 4 | 11/4 | |
| 3 | ▶ Jaymir Arlob 4yN/R 34 | J Daly — 18% R238 W44 P126 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 49 | 62 (3) | 49 (6) | 53 (5) | 67 (3) | 67 (2) | 59 (2) | 83 (1) | 55 (5) | 50 (5) | 67 (4) | 31 | 53 | - | 36 | 61 | 54 | - | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Bombay Tildab 2y 6 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 44 | 44 | 46 (5) | 60 (3) | 20 (2) | 14 (5) | 55 (6) | 13 (6) | 62 (3) | 48 (5) | 63 (3) | 80 (1) | 30 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 38 | 31 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Swift Zigd 3y 27 | D T Smith — 16% R403 W64 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 63 | 66 | 54 (5) | 55 (5) | 52 (4) | 75 (2) | 46 (6) | 72 (3) | 54 (6) | 21 (3) | 61 (4) | 23 (1) | 29 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 44 | 37 | 3 | 5/4F | |
| 6 | ▶ Noelles Pelod 3y 16 | E Saville — 18% R106 W19 P55 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 55 | 35 (6) | 49 (6) | 57 (4) | 63 (3) | 58 (5) | 47 (6) | 90 (1) | 19 (3) | 54 (4) | 70 (3) | 29 | 46 | - | 31 | 59 | 51 | 2 | 7/2 | |
Perdey is comfortably the classiest dog in this race and arrives on the back of a winning run in A4 company last time out. Her form reads well — alternating between wins and placed efforts at a consistent level. She's a closer who doesn't need the front, and that's fine over 500 metres at Nottingham where the long run home gives finishing types their opportunity. Drawn on the rail in trap 1 — which wins at 23.3% at these conditions — everything is set up nicely. Her track suitability of 60 is the best in the field and confirms she handles Nottingham well.
Second-best on ability with a strong finishing kick, but the worst trap draw at these conditions tempers expectations — the main danger nonetheless.
Well drawn but significantly outclassed — the trap position can't compensate for the quality gap.
Good trap draw but well below the required standard — likely to weaken through the closing stages.
Quick out of the boxes but will weaken badly through the final two bends — set to be caught by the closers.
Brilliant last run but hard to trust the form leap — wide draw and inconsistent record mean she's one to watch rather than back.
Low sample size but inside/mid traps dominate. Perdey's rail draw aligns well with the structural data. Big class gap between top 3 and bottom 3.
T1:23.3% T2:27.6% T3:7.1% T4:24.1% T5:12.1% T6:11.8%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Perdey | 41 | 100 | Closer |
2Oode Lally | 100 | 0 | Fader |
3Jaymir Arlo | 44 | 100 | Closer |
4Bombay Tilda | 55 | 0 | Fader |
5Swift Zig | 100 | 0 | Fader |
6Noelles Pelo | 45 | 100 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.