| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Tickity Tillyb 5yN/R 25 | S Atkinson — 21% R252 W52 P172 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 56 | 56 | 47 (5) | 70 (2) | 75 (1) | 55 (4) | 59 (3) | 64 (2) | 56 (3) | 66 (2) | 46 (4) | 46 (5) | 43 | 24 | 17 | 23 | 58 | 48 | - | - | |
| 2 | ▶ Bogger Dewieb 3yN/R 13 | S Atkinson — 21% R252 W52 P172 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 63 | 43 | 57 (4) | 62 (3) | 59 (3) | 53 (3) | 58 (3) | 55 (4) | 73 (1) | 75 (1) | 59 (2) | 73 (1) | 26 | 20 | 31 | 29 | 60 | 48 | - | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Moonveen Dancerb 2y 16 | D Alcorn — 22% R41 W9 P23 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 57 | 79 (3) | 100 (1) | 80 (2) | 58 (6) | 60 (5) | 69 (3) | 56 (3) | - | - | - | 13 | 52 | - | 36 | 62 | 52 | 1 | 5/6F | |
| 4 | ▶ Burgess Siunb 3y 23 | C M Dibb — 12% R317 W38 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 40 | 22 (6) | 41 (1) | 64 (2) | 38 (1) | 36 (1) | 33 (2) | 34 (2) | 50 (4) | 69 (1) | 49 (4) | 49 | 40 | 17 | - | 43 | 44 | 2 | 13/8 | |
| 5 | ▶ Last To Firstb 2y 14 | C M Dibb — 12% R317 W38 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 43 | 50 | 59 (2) | 42 (4) | 44 (6) | 42 (5) | 52 (3) | 32 (5) | 39 (5) | 39 (5) | 48 (4) | 54 (2) | 16 | 7 | 14 | 13 | 48 | 35 | 3 | 4/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Mid Tipp Frankyd 3y 4 | C M Dibb — 12% R317 W38 P157 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 33 | 51 | 63 (2) | 67 (2) | 47 (4) | 55 (4) | 54 (3) | 71 (1) | 46 (4) | 70 (1) | 56 (3) | 46 (5) | 27 | 13 | - | 18 | 44 | 35 | 4 | 10/1 | |
Burgess Siun gets the nod from the prediction model and the structural case is sound. Trap 4 is the dominant box at A5 435m, winning 25.6% from 82 runs — a significant edge. His form reads 50, 55, 73, 36, 31 showing capability at his best but with below-par efforts mixed in. That 73 three starts ago was outstanding A5 form. He has previously won twice at this level, suggesting he can deliver from the ideal draw. Best speed figures in the field add to the case.
Most consistent runner in the field — should be in the frame but may lack the kick to get up.
Best form in the field but worst draw — talent versus structure makes him a danger, not the pick.
Improved sharply last time but needs to prove it was not a flash in the pan.
Confirmed closer who needs everything to fall right — unlikely to feature unless pace collapses.
Talented on his day but too inconsistent after a poor last outing.
Trap 4 is clearly dominant at A5 435m. Composite rank 2 outperforms rank 1 historically (27.4% vs 17.6%).
T1:16.7% T2:15.6% T3:22.0% T4:25.6% T5:17.7% T6:17.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 435m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Tickity Tilly | 50 | 59 | Closer |
2Bogger Dewie | 0 | 100 | Closer |
3Moonveen Dancer | 59 | 26 | Fader |
4Burgess Siun | 43 | 65 | Closer |
5Last To First | 50 | 41 | All-Rounder |
6Mid Tipp Franky | 51 | 41 | All-Rounder |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.