| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Wessex Duchessb 3y 5 | K J Crocker — 16% R142 W23 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | - | 29 (1) | 21 (4) | 28 (1) | 29 (1) | 21 (4) | 28 (1) | 19 (4) | 27 (2) | 15 (5) | 26 (2) | 17 | 17 | 28 | 17 | 20 | 19 | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Wessex Lanced 3y 25 | K J Crocker — 16% R142 W23 P78 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | - | 42 (3) | 34 (4) | 44 (2) | 24 (2) | 47 (2) | 22 (2) | 22 (4) | 19 (5) | 24 (3) | 23 (3) | 24 | 10 | - | 10 | 22 | 19 | 6 | 7/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Salacres Selectb 1y 14 | P H Harnden — 18% R396 W71 P224 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 45 | - | 19 (5) | 18 (5) | 25 (2) | 24 (2) | 28 (2) | 30 (3) | 21 (1) | 28 (3) | - | - | 66 | 48 | 30 | 43 | 24 | 34 | 1 | 15/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Swift Year Longd 1y 27 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | - | 37 (4) | 40 (2) | 34 (4) | 14 (6) | 18 (6) | 20 (3) | 23 (2) | - | - | - | 40 | 21 | 15 | 21 | 21 | 23 | 3 | 7/4F | |
| 5 | ▶ Maireads Duchessb 4y 16 | A Ioannou — 13% R89 W12 P54 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 49 | - | 20 (5) | 28 (1) | 24 (2) | 21 (3) | 19 (4) | 18 (4) | 23 (5) | 15 (2) | 20 (6) | - | 22 | 32 | 13 | 32 | 20 | 23 | 4 | 8/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Decent Jeffd 3y 4 | N J Deas — 17% R447 W76 P245 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | - | 22 (4) | 29 (1) | 23 (3) | 25 (2) | 27 (2) | 22 (3) | 19 (6) | 17 (6) | 23 (2) | 26 (2) | 34 | 29 | 28 | 29 | 22 | 25 | 2 | 4/1 | |
Stands out in this field on suitability — the highest track, distance and trap scores by a significant margin, with a trap suitability of 66 that suggests she thrives from this box. Won at D5 last time and placed at D4 before that, confirming she's competitive at this level and above. Drawn in a dominant trap winning 23.9% and the structural and individual data are fully aligned. The composite score of 34 is the clear highest in the field. Trainer Harnden's 20% strike rate adds to the positive picture.
Good speed from a productive draw with consistent form — the clear danger.
Consistent placer but the draw and modest ratings limit her chance.
Best draw on paper but poor individual record at this course limits him.
Lightly raced with promise but the dead draw is a real obstacle.
Impossible draw at 7% — virtually impossible to recommend from trap 5.
Same condition profile as Race 1. Three dominant traps (2, 3, 6) with T5 dead. The pick is in dominant T3 with exceptional suitability — the best structural alignment in the race. Small sample size (270 runs) but the trap pattern is consistent.
T1:14.3% T2:25.0% T3:23.9% T4:14.3% T5:7.3% T6:24.3%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 270m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.