Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
Follow Newcastle Greyhounds On Facebook Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Tyne Tees Richied 4y 35 | J J Fenwick — 19% R499 W95 P286 Trainer form — last 3 months | 57 | 53 | 50 (6) | 43 (6) | 87 (1) | 65 (3) | 75 (2) | 39 (5) | 38 (2) | 34 (3) | 51 (5) | - | 63 | 48 | 15 | 26 | 56 | 51 | 2 | 11/10F | ||
| 2 | ▶ Bramble Paulinab 3y 15 | C L Hardy — 20% R203 W40 P125 Trainer form — last 3 months | 48 | 47 | 55 (4) | 26 (4) | 25 (5) | 56 (5) | 66 (2) | 66 (2) | 25 (5) | 38 (2) | 77 (1) | 61 (2) | 54 | 32 | 18 | 14 | 50 | 42 | 6 | 14/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Greenhill Jazzb 2y 6 | A Harrison — 19% R512 W98 P304 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 44 | 27 (4) | 36 (1) | 73 (1) | 55 (4) | 54 (4) | 28 (3) | 32 (3) | 36 (1) | 54 (5) | - | 72 | 43 | - | 43 | 47 | 50 | 3 | 8/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Alnwick Avab 3y 17 | A Harrison — 19% R512 W98 P304 Trainer form — last 3 months | 29 | 56 | 44 (5) | 73 (2) | 78 (1) | 41 (5) | 47 (5) | 77 (1) | 59 (1) | 66 (4) | 58 (2) | - | 77 | 61 | - | - | 60 | 65 | 1 | 5/2 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Butterbridge Topb 2y 17 | J J Fenwick — 19% R499 W95 P286 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 54 | 30 (2) | 46 (6) | 48 (5) | 61 (4) | 56 (5) | 25 (5) | 72 (5) | 44 (2) | 74 (5) | - | 37 | 47 | - | 43 | 54 | 48 | 4 | 11/4 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Swift Leond 2y 27 | J T Edgar — 17% R484 W81 P277 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | 49 | 52 (3) | 43 (5) | 64 (2) | 66 (2) | 60 (2) | 42 (5) | 42 (6) | 30 (2) | 78 (1) | 72 (1) | 43 | 40 | - | 55 | 58 | 52 | 5 | 12/1 | ||
The highest-rated dog for these conditions combining solid average performance of 58 with the best distance suitability in the field at 55. His recent form shows a clear upward trend with back-to-back seconds and a strong closing effort. An all-rounder who led briefly last time over course and distance before being headed, suggesting he has the early pace to be competitive at the sprint trip. Trained by the capable Jim Edgar. The wide draw could be a concern at a sprint but his distance credentials and improving form make him the pick.
Best dog on ability with excellent trap credentials but untested at the sprint distance - the key danger if she adapts.
Proven over course and distance from the inside draw with the best trap suitability in the field - a genuine contender.
Wrong profile for a sprint - slow starter and closer who needs a longer trip to show her best. Likely to struggle.
Closer profile is a concern but exceptional trap suitability and decent distance form give her a place chance.
Right profile for a sprint with early pace and decent distance form but too unreliable to be confident.
Only 10 runs at these exact conditions - too small a sample for meaningful structural analysis. Sprint dynamics should be analysed from first principles: early pace, bend ability, and running style matter most at 290m.
T1:50% T2:0% T3:50% T4:0% T5:0% T6:0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 290m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.