| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Harlequin Beautyb 3y 23 | - | - | 86 | 83 | 60 (3) | 55 (5) | 68 (2) | 62 (3) | 63 (6) | 69 (3) | 53 (5) | 70 (6) | 70 (5) | - | 57 | 42 | 20 | - | 62 | 54 | 2 | 7/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Ower Crackerd 4y 63 | - | - | 29 | 16 | 68 (3) | 88 (1) | 54 (5) | 64 (4) | 70 (4) | 42 (6) | 64 (2) | 72 (3) | 87 (1) | 95 (1) | 25 | 37 | 37 | 25 | 69 | 43 | 4 | 11/8F | |
| 4 | ▶ Chelms Wildd 3y 42 | - | - | 64 | 30 | 46 (5) | 82 (3) | 95 (2) | 68 (3) | 45 (6) | 72 (3) | 66 (3) | 92 (1) | 67 (3) | 74 (2) | 31 | 15 | 6 | 18 | 69 | 38 | 1 | 14/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ El Tornillod 4y 51 | - | - | 30 | 20 | 49 (6) | 62 (3) | 44 (4) | 92 (1) | 72 (4) | 94 (1) | 72 (3) | 62 (4) | 49 (6) | 69 (3) | 17 | 23 | 33 | 27 | 65 | 37 | 5 | 7/4 | |
| 6 | ▶ Clairkeith Santid 4y 53 | - | - | 82 | 79 | 93 (1) | 75 (3) | 77 (2) | 80 (2) | 74 (2) | 68 (2) | 66 (4) | 75 (3) | 80 (2) | 56 (5) | 35 | 33 | - | - | 77 | 49 | 3 | 22/1 | |
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 515m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Harlequin Beauty | 0 | 50 | All-Rounder |
3Ower Cracker | 50 | 59 | Closer |
4Chelms Wild | 0 | 100 | Closer |
5El Tornillo | 100 | 12 | Fader |
6Clairkeith Santi | 100 | 0 | Fader |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.