Homing Dogs With Home Run Hounds Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ New Cross Nightsb 3y 6 | B Denby — 20% R260 W51 P146 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 62 (3) | 62 (4) | 66 (4) | 72 (1) | 50 (4) | 73 (1) | 55 (3) | 63 (2) | 60 (2) | 54 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 5/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Honour Mylab 2y 8 | A S Mcpherson — 15% R285 W42 P132 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 46 (5) | 44 (5) | 46 (6) | 49 (5) | 40 (6) | 58 (4) | 73 (1) | 52 (5) | 71 (5) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 11/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Hollyhill Bulletd 1y 4 | F Macklin — 20% R205 W42 P105 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 83 (2) | 90 (1) | 80 (1) | 53 (3) | 62 (2) | 74 (1) | 63 (2) | 70 (1) | 59 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 15/8 | |
| 4 | ▶ Mid Tipp Maggieb 1y 18 | E O Driver — 21% R319 W66 P198 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 81 (1) | 75 (1) | 61 (2) | 65 (2) | 64 (2) | 69 (1) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 11/10F | |
| 5 | ▶ Honour Neezd 3y 15 | A S Mcpherson — 15% R285 W42 P132 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 71 (1) | 63 (2) | 25 (6) | 50 (4) | 31 (3) | 48 (4) | 39 (5) | 54 (4) | 57 (5) | 36 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 7/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Cloneen Giftb 3y 5 | E O Driver — 21% R319 W66 P198 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | - | - | 31 (5) | 36 (6) | 43 (3) | 62 (3) | 59 (4) | 55 (3) | 59 (2) | 38 (5) | 59 (3) | 55 (2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 12/1 | |
New Cross Nights has been the model of consistency at this level, posting 60, 54, 53, 53, 62 and 66 in her recent runs — never brilliant but never poor. That kind of reliability is worth a lot in A5 company where the field is closely matched. She gets the second-strongest trap in the race at 21.7% and the Denby kennel at 22% adds further support. Her last run of 60 when second here confirms she handles the track well. In a low-separation grade, this consistency and a strong structural draw make a compelling case.
Rapidly improving and trained by a strong kennel — the danger if the upward curve is genuine.
Talented but unreliable. Class dropper who could go well or flop.
Strong recent trio of runs make her a place threat. Could surprise.
Best draw but inconsistent form. Place claims on the structure alone.
Dead draw and erratic form. Very much against her tonight.
Low separation (1pp R1-R3). T5 and T1 structurally strongest. T6 dead. Speed rank 1 at 23.8% is the strongest predictor.
T1:21.7% T2:19.2% T3:19.7% T4:19.0% T5:22.6% T6:13.9%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 500m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.