Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Clay Lionessesb 3y 15 | T D Coote — 18% R556 W102 P281 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 49 | 34 (6) | 47 (3) | 51 (3) | 49 (2) | 52 (3) | 45 (4) | 33 (6) | 47 (3) | 31 (6) | 42 (5) | 28 | 33 | 8 | 12 | 44 | 42 | 4 | 11/4 | ||
| 2 | ▶ Apple Jamd 4yREP 24 | J Robinson — 19% R295 W55 P166 Trainer form — last 3 months | 35 | 36 | 41 (3) | 48 (4) | 16 (6) | 15 (6) | 55 (1) | 33 (5) | 47 (2) | 41 (5) | 29 (5) | 45 (3) | 16 | 21 | 14 | 19 | 36 | 28 | 5 | 40/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Lets Go Pablod 2y 18 | I Zivkovic — 14% R614 W85 P291 Trainer form — last 3 months | 52 | 78 | 32 (1) | 38 (4) | 32 (1) | 47 (2) | 43 (4) | 47 (2) | 40 (4) | 48 (2) | 48 (3) | 48 (3) | 24 | 27 | 21 | 23 | 42 | 48 | 1 | 5/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Swift Lenab 2y 210 | J Robinson — 19% R295 W55 P166 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | 71 | 64 (1) | 57 (1) | 50 (3) | 32 (1) | 21 (6) | 30 (2) | 29 (2) | 27 (3) | 44 (6) | 36 (1) | 30 | 28 | 30 | 27 | 38 | 43 | 2 | 15/8F | ||
| 5 | ▶ Da Maureens Starb 3y 2 | J S Atkins — 14% R295 W42 P154 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | 48 | 49 (2) | 51 (2) | 43 (4) | 38 (6) | 58 (1) | 43 (3) | 38 (4) | 32 (6) | 24 (3) | 19 (5) | 16 | 13 | 27 | 22 | 41 | 43 | 3 | 2/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Swift Viennab 1y 15 | J Robinson — 19% R295 W55 P166 Trainer form — last 3 months | 39 | - | 46 (2) | 28 (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 31 | 25 | - | - | 28 | 35 | 6 | 6/1 | ||
Won at A8 level here on May 17, posting a performance figure of 57 from T4. T4 is one of the structurally better draws at A8 Kinsley, winning 18.26% from 241 historical runs. The performance average of 38 is modest but the winning run just five days ago is the most recent form evidence of any runner in the field, and at this grade, current winning form from a decent draw is the clearest signal available. A sandwiched D4 268m win on May 3 suggests she maintained fitness and form between outings. She is not a dominant selection by any means — this is a competitive race — but the recent win from the best-drawn position makes her the logical starting point for analysis.
Most consistent performer in the field with four consecutive placings across A7 and A8 grades.
Decent A8 form with a second place two runs back but modest performance average. T3 is a useful draw.
Second last time at A8 shows she can compete in this grade but poor track suitability and T5 limit appeal.
Last time out was a sixth at A8 — poor recent form. T1 worst draw. Step up from A7 runs that ended in third.
D5 268m sprinter stepping up to A8 462m — wrong trip, wrong grade. Distance and class suitability both zero.
T3 and T4 modest structural leaders at A8. T1 and T2 weakest. Composite model slightly useful — R1 at 18.71%.
T1:15.6% T2:15.7% T3:18.5% T4:18.3% T5:17.5% T6:18.1%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Clay Lionesses | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
2Apple Jam | 34 | 60 | Closer |
3Lets Go Pablo | 75 | 3 | Fader |
4Swift Lena | 74 | 6 | Fader |
5Da Maureens Star | 46 | 58 | Closer |
6Swift Vienna | — | — | No data |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.