Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
Newcastle Greyhound Stadium Stakes
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Bramble Paulinab 3y 26 | C L Hardy — 20% R203 W40 P125 Trainer form — last 3 months | 53 | 47 | 55 (4) | 25 (5) | 56 (5) | 66 (2) | 66 (2) | 34 (3) | 25 (5) | 38 (2) | 77 (1) | 61 (2) | 35 | 30 | - | 8 | 49 | 31 | 2 | 9/4JF | ||
| 2 | ▶ Alnwick Teenyb 2y 36 | A Harrison — 20% R497 W97 P297 Trainer form — last 3 months | 48 | 45 | 59 (3) | 35 (1) | 33 (5) | 47 (3) | 72 (1) | 45 (5) | 39 (5) | 44 (6) | 68 (1) | 30 (6) | 25 | 33 | 30 | 30 | 45 | 26 | 5 | 10/1 | ||
| 3 | ▶ Alnwick Potterd 3y 6 | A Harrison — 20% R497 W97 P297 Trainer form — last 3 months | 51 | 55 | 30 (2) | 27 (3) | 29 (2) | 60 (3) | 52 (4) | 54 (4) | 72 (1) | 65 (2) | 55 (3) | 55 (4) | - | 39 | 24 | 28 | 44 | 35 | 4 | 3/1 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Bramble Gibsond 3y 110 | C L Hardy — 20% R203 W40 P125 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | 56 | 33 (2) | 26 (3) | 55 (3) | 37 (4) | 39 (6) | 51 (4) | 34 (5) | 61 (2) | 68 (1) | 55 (2) | 26 | 21 | - | - | 45 | 28 | 3 | 4/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Coppice Uteb 2y 9 | J J Fenwick — 19% R491 W95 P280 Trainer form — last 3 months | 59 | 53 | 35 (6) | 36 (1) | 34 (2) | 26 (6) | 35 (5) | 56 (2) | 63 (1) | 45 (2) | 54 (2) | 50 (4) | 19 | 37 | 16 | 41 | 41 | 31 | 1 | 9/4JF | ||
| 6 | ▶ Solway Blued 2y 25 | D Little — 22% R105 W23 P64 Trainer form — last 3 months | 27 | 47 | 36 (5) | 47 (4) | 36 (6) | 41 (4) | 24 (6) | 35 (5) | 71 (1) | 53 (2) | 47 (5) | 53 (4) | 23 | 26 | - | - | 44 | 26 | 6 | 7/1 | ||
Coppice Ute has the strongest form in this field by a clear margin, posting back-to-back sprint wins here in 17.30 and 17.32 — both faster than any rival's recent best at this distance. The speed figure of 59 is the highest in the race and the fader profile is less of a concern in a 290-metre contest where there is simply not enough track to fade meaningfully. The T5 draw at 14.3% is below the field average and is the one note of caution, but in sprint racing the dog with the fastest proven times over the exact trip has a strong argument regardless of box allocation. The confidence rating is kept Tentative rather than higher because the draw disadvantage is real and the D3 sample size of 144 runs means the trap statistics carry some noise. On form alone, however, this is the clear choice.
Second-best draw and placed last time. The draw-based danger to the pick in this sprint.
Poor recent outing and no C&D wins make this a difficult case to argue for here.
Won last time but worst draw outside T3 and speed slower than main rival. Hard to side with here.
Worst draw in the race is a critical flaw in sprint company. Capable but structurally disadvantaged.
Best draw but no 290m experience. Cannot trust the trap data advantage without trip evidence.
Small sample of 144 runs. T6 statistically best draw at 30.4%, T4 second at 26.1%, T3 catastrophically poor at 7.7%. Speed and composite rank 1 do not predict well at this distance — form and draw dominate over rating models in D3 sprint company.
T1:20.0% T2:11.5% T3:7.7% T4:26.1% T5:14.3% T6:30.4%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 290m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.