Loading...
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | Bet | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | ||||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Droopys Natalieb 3y 16 | E G Samuels — 16% R649 W103 P363 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 52 | 59 (3) | 63 (3) | 57 (3) | 72 (1) | 68 (1) | 58 (3) | 57 (2) | 45 (5) | 65 (1) | 46 (3) | 24 | 26 | - | 31 | 60 | 40 | 4 | 7/2 | - | |
| 3 | ▶ Alfies Ladd 3y 29 | C R Morris — 28% R270 W76 P181 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 64 | 64 | 48 (5) | 48 (5) | 72 (2) | 50 (5) | 72 (2) | 91 (1) | 91 (1) | 49 (6) | 64 (5) | 61 (4) | 30 | 47 | - | 28 | 62 | 36 | 1 | 11/8F | - | |
| 4 | ▶ Lady Danielleb 2y 7 | V K Thom — 22% R137 W30 P90 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 55 | 42 | 52 (5) | 78 (1) | 62 (4) | 68 (2) | 74 (1) | 55 (4) | 64 (2) | 82 (1) | 60 (2) | 60 (2) | 50 | 54 | 28 | 50 | 65 | 53 | 2 | 11/4 | - | |
| 5 | ▶ Curraleigh Roseb 2y 210 | K L Windebank — 17% R566 W95 P313 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 52 | 60 | 70 (2) | 64 (2) | 52 (4) | 50 (5) | 58 (3) | 51 (5) | 56 (5) | 77 (1) | 66 (2) | 74 (1) | - | 36 | 37 | 32 | 59 | 42 | 3 | 7/1 | - | |
| 6 | ▶ Swift Yesd 1y 17 | E G Samuels — 16% R649 W103 P363 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 41 | 40 | 61 (4) | 70 (1) | 65 (2) | 53 (4) | 67 (1) | 63 (1) | 55 (2) | - | - | - | 61 | 51 | 14 | 48 | 63 | 44 | 5 | 4/1 | - | |
Composite rank one in this field from T3 — a solid 22% draw at A4. The 77-day layoff was a concern until the trial evidence resolved it: a 462m trial in 28.58 finishing first confirms the trainer has kept this dog in active preparation. The trial time is competitive at A4 level and the winning position rules out any fitness question. Combined with leading composite and performance rank in the field, the analytical picture is clear. Yarmouth's demanding long straight tests whether a dog truly arrives race-fit, and the trial is the best available proxy for that readiness. Medium confidence reflects the inherent uncertainty around returning runners even with trial evidence, but the weight of evidence supports this selection.
Consistent A4 form, second composite rank — main danger if selection is not fully wound up.
Best draw but third composite — draw edge alone insufficient.
Below-average draw, mid-table form — no case for the top spot.
Dead trap and lowest composite rank — decisive against.
T4 leads at 22.14% after T2 non-runner. T6 dead at 13.43%. Alfies Lad trialled (28.58, pos 1) resolves layoff concern.
T1:18.37% T3:21.96% T4:22.14% T5:17.72% T6:13.43%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 462m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Droopys Natalie | 55 | 38 | Fader |
3Alfies Lad | 69 | 22 | Fader |
4Lady Danielle | 43 | 69 | Closer |
5Curraleigh Rose | 50 | 50 | All-Rounder |
6Swift Yes | 39 | 56 | Closer |
Only runs at exactly 462m — no cross-distance comparisons. Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.