Loading racecard
Loading...
Loading racecard
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Class | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Rating | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 2 | ▶ Skidrow Lunab 2y 18 | D Calvert — 17% R549 W93 P313 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 37 (2) | 35 (4) | 31 (4) | 43 (3) | 36 (1) | 31 (1) | 25 (2) | 25 (4) | 32 (4) | - | 47 | 39 | 48 | 45 | 28 | 33 | 2 | 10/11F | ||
| 3 | ▶ Get Away Sadieb 2y 7 | S Watson — 31% R421 W129 P297 Trainer form — last 3 months | 50 | - | 30 (3) | 27 (5) | 28 (3) | 23 (4) | 36 (1) | 27 (3) | 28 (5) | 36 (1) | 33 (2) | 18 (5) | 52 | 31 | 20 | 31 | 27 | 31 | 4 | 7/4 | ||
| 4 | ▶ Hotshotoftequilad 3y 8 | M Haythorne — 20% R86 W17 P42 Trainer form — last 3 months | 44 | - | 27 (3) | 34 (1) | 23 (4) | 23 (5) | 17 (5) | 18 (5) | 37 (4) | 29 (1) | 36 (2) | - | 53 | 40 | 39 | 46 | 26 | 33 | 5 | 7/1 | ||
| 5 | ▶ Slaneyside Janb 2y 4 | R J Overton — 18% R328 W58 P196 Trainer form — last 3 months | 55 | - | 30 (2) | 36 (1) | 29 (3) | 33 (2) | 28 (3) | 30 (2) | 34 (2) | 25 (4) | 25 (5) | 32 (4) | 45 | 35 | 35 | 36 | 31 | 34 | 1 | 7/1 | ||
| 6 | ▶ Gizmo Jeckelb 3y 26 | C A Williams — 15% R369 W54 P187 Trainer form — last 3 months | 49 | - | 34 (5) | 53 (5) | 49 (2) | 28 (5) | 27 (4) | 23 (5) | 32 (1) | 28 (2) | 25 (5) | 26 (4) | 48 | 32 | 11 | 43 | 27 | 32 | 3 | 5/1 | ||
Slaneyside Jan is the models predicted winner despite drawing in structurally disadvantaged trap 5 (18.18% win rate from 209 runs—the weakest draw available). However, she compensates with the highest average performance rating (31) and solid suitability across track (35), distance (36), and notably trap (45). R J Overton trains with respectable 22% strike rate. Form has been improving: recent results show 4, 5, 2 suggesting a trajectory toward success. She has won from this box before (suitability 45 confirms proven history), and her superior rating advantage over this weak field supports the selection despite the unfavourable draw. The prediction prioritises her class edge over trap position.
Best structural position available in race with supporting form. Genuine danger if she leads early.
Moderate form from an unfavoured draw. Class suitability (20) rules out as a serious contender.
Neutral structural position with moderate form doesnt build a compelling case in competitive low-separation field.
Class disadvantage (suitability 11) is the decisive factor despite respectable trap position and trainer record.
Low composite separation (R1 23.86% vs R3 21.65% = 2.2pp gap) signals ratings are noise at this grade. Trap position and individual suitability become primary factors. Absence of a T1 runner creates an unusual scenario—T2 becomes the best-positioned box. This is a competitive race with no standout edge.
T1:26.82% T2:23.77% T3:18.75% T4:20.91% T5:18.18% T6:21.07%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 275m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.