Loading...
ROMFORD Saturday Night 4th April 2026 PGR Meeting
| Trap | Dog | Trainer | Rated | Spd | Bnd | Suitability | Form | Comp | Pred | SP | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LR | 2LR | 3LR | 4LR | 5LR | 6LR | 7LR | 8LR | 9LR | 10LR | Trap | Track | Class | Dist | |||||||||||
| 1 | ▶ Orange Camillab 2y 36 | M E Westwood — 14% R250 W34 P117 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 48 | 53 | 32 (4) | 20 (6) | 22 (6) | 27 (6) | 41 (2) | 32 (6) | 35 (4) | 52 (2) | 56 (2) | 40 (5) | 49 | 47 | 31 | 47 | 44 | 46 | 2 | 4/1 | |
| 2 | ▶ Old Fort Wifib 2y 5 | T Batchelor — 14% R109 W15 P57 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 42 | 47 | 51 (4) | 70 (1) | 58 (2) | 57 (2) | 65 (1) | 73 (1) | 64 (2) | 42 (5) | 32 (6) | 59 (1) | 62 | 59 | - | 51 | 54 | 56 | 1 | 6/1 | |
| 3 | ▶ Blackstone Storyd 2y 15 | D K Hurlock — 19% R930 W176 P509 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 51 | 34 | 34 (4) | 45 (5) | 40 (4) | 52 (3) | 37 (5) | 56 (2) | 55 (3) | 65 (1) | 42 (4) | 54 (1) | 61 | 40 | - | 43 | 48 | 49 | 4 | 10/3 | |
| 4 | ▶ Chelms Harryd 2y 16 | A Kelly-pilgrim — 14% R206 W28 P90 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 53 | 56 | 51 (4) | 39 (5) | 48 (3) | 64 (1) | 60 (1) | 41 (4) | 40 (5) | 39 (4) | 48 (3) | 39 (5) | 21 | 18 | - | 22 | 46 | 34 | 6 | 6/1 | |
| 5 | ▶ Whodoyoucolmd 3y 46 | D K Hurlock — 19% R930 W176 P509 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 50 | 53 | 25 (5) | 27 (6) | 48 (3) | 41 (4) | 43 (4) | 58 (1) | 55 (1) | 31 (5) | 45 (3) | 44 (3) | 39 | 30 | - | 30 | 45 | 40 | 5 | 5/1 | |
| 6 | ▶ Blazeaway Blued 3y 5 | P W Young — 18% R1322 W243 P772 Trainer form — last 3 months | - | 54 | 52 | 50 (3) | 51 (3) | 56 (1) | 45 (2) | 45 (3) | 48 (2) | 41 (4) | 42 (4) | 55 (3) | 44 (5) | 37 | 32 | - | 33 | 50 | 43 | 3 | 6/4F | |
Old Fort Wifi epitomises the profile required here. This closer has demonstrated remarkable consistency across five recent runs, recovering from moderate placings to showcase sustained competitiveness. The dog combines genuine closing speed with proven suitability to Romford, where the track geometry rewards dogs that travel three wide through the middle stages and strike decisively in the home bend. Trap two provides natural positioning advantage and pairs perfectly with a closing style. No significant flaws in form or capability.
Unlikely to trouble the placings.
Modest threat from proven closer type.
Decent all-rounder but lacks draw advantage and closing specialisation.
Fader profile with worst draw. Unlikely to sustain through bend 2.
Closer threat but form inconsistent vs pick.
Traps one, two and three show clear evidence of advantage, particularly trap two which combines positional and draw bias. Trap five is clearly disadvantaged—early pace runners from this draw face interference challenges and must overcome a structural deficit.
T1:20.8% T2:21.7% T3:21.1% T4:16.4% T5:14.3% T6:17.0%
Speed Progress · Adjusted times at 400m · Fastest at top
Pre-race stats that explain the top 3 finishers
Pace Profile
Avg early pace vs closing speed from last 5 runs
| Dog | Early | Close | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
1Orange Camilla | 58 | 17 | Fader |
2Old Fort Wifi | 0 | 100 | Closer |
3Blackstone Story | 0 | 100 | Closer |
4Chelms Harry | 51 | 43 | All-Rounder |
5Whodoyoucolm | 64 | 1 | Fader |
6Blazeaway Blue | 49 | 57 | Closer |
How consistent is each dog? Tight cluster = reliable, wide spread = volatile. Faster times on the left. Hover any dot for race details. Amber = troubled run.
Performance rating trend over last 10 races. Hover any dot for race details. Amber dots = troubled runs.
Trainer patterns, moves signals, and form streaks at this venue.